Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing <br />Ordinance No. 99-83 <br />loss of green space. This is currently zoned as a residential property, and he fully <br />understands it can be landscaped, graded, trees can be removed at the discretion of the <br />property owner, without the consuhation of the City Council. However, that would <br />adversely impact the neighborhood. He also sees a loss of a sound deadening from <br />Lorain Road. There would be an increased rainwater runoff if this property were rezoned <br />and re-paved to be used as a parking lot. There would be increased artificial lighting, <br />which is already quite strong from the existing Kia lot. There would be increased traffic <br />on Dewey Road, and they have existing documentation of car carriers unloading and <br />paving trucks using Dewey Road as a temporary road. There would also be a decreased <br />property value of all of the properties on Dewey Road. If this is offset by the tax benefits <br />or revenue that would come in from the rezoning, the residents would like to see what the <br />offsets are. In addition, there would be some loss of property taxes and income taxes if <br />residents decide to move away and sell their property. The residents do not see the <br />advantages to homeowners of Dewey Road with this proposed rezoning. <br />David Holder 4985 Porter Road, lives behind one ofthe biggest Giant Eagle's in Ohio, if <br />not the biggest. It is over a million square feet, which is above our city limits, but they <br />were allowed to do it. There are good points and bad points to a six or eight foot high <br />mound. He appreciates the one behind him. But it's in his backyard, not his front yard <br />and not right next to his house. He would very strongly be against that if he were the <br />people on Dewey. He thinks this ordinance opens up the door to taking all of the houses <br />on Dewey and using the same excuses to get the houses on Porter Road and houses on <br />North Park that would be backing up against it. He thinks this ordinance should be <br />strongly looked at and opposed by everyone that sees it. Those are his personal feelings, <br />but he also knows that many of the other residents on his portion of Porter Road feel the <br />same way. <br />Kim Doyle 5201 Dewey Road. She and her husband purchased a piece of the "American <br />Dream" when they purchased their first home on Dewey about five years ago. What <br />attracted her the most was, as soon as she pulled down the street, she saw the green space, <br />the trees, and saw the fact that it was a very quiet street. If she had seen Halleen <br />Chevrolet or any type of car dealership sitting there at the end of the street, they would <br />not have purchased the house. When is it more important to have commercial industry <br />than people's homes? There are enough car dealerships. The nice view they have in <br />their backyard will be gone. She is strongly against this. There's nothing they can do to <br />make it better, to make it more attractive. It's going to be a car dealership anyway you <br />look at it. It's going to be noisy, there will be more traffic and a lot more lighting. She is <br />very unhappy about that. <br />Peg Smith, 5212 Dewey Road, and has lived there for 35 years. She intended to spend all <br />her days in North Olmsted. But if this goes through, she will definitely put her house up <br />for sale. Her daughter is living there now and had intended to remain. However, they do <br />not want to look at a car dealership. The porch comes up maybe as tall as she is, and a <br />six-foot mound would do absolutely no good. They would see right over it, and out of <br />their second story windows they would see the whole thing. They do not appreciate <br />2 <br />.a..~ ,..w_ .., _ - <br />