Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL <br />,: OF THE CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MAY 16, 2000 <br />Present: Council President Saringer, Council Members Gareau, Kasler, Limpert, <br />McKay, Miller, Nashar, O'Grady <br />Also Present: Mayor Musial, Assistant Law Director Dubelko, Finance Director Copfer, <br />Clerk of Council Seman <br />Council President Saringer called the meeting to order at 8:03 p.m. in Council Chambers, <br />5200 Dover Center Road, North Olmsted, Ohio. <br />Members of the audience were invited to join Council in reciting the Pledge of <br />Allegiance to the Flag. <br />The minutes of the special Council meeting of March 29, 2000 were approved as written. <br />The minutes of the Council meeting of April 4, 2000 were approved as written. <br />President Saringer announced that Ordinances 2000-59, 2000-63 and 2000-64 would be <br />passed under suspension of the rules. <br />President Saringer welcomed the large audience and explained that Ordinance 99-54 was <br />to be given its second reading but would not be passed. She noted that the legislation had <br />been under consideration since last year and had been discussed at several committee <br />meetings, the latest of which was held on May 15, 2000. Those wishing to address this <br />legislation will be heard under Audience Participation, and it would be helpful for <br />specific groups to designate one representative to speak. <br />REPORTS <br />Mayor Musial: 1) The oath of office was administered to new police officer, Jennifer <br />Smith, on May 15, 2000. Ms. Smith is our second female police officer. <br />2) Resolutions 2000-63 and 2000-64, which will be passed under suspension of the rule, <br />recognize the North Olmsted High School Marching Band. We are all proud of their <br />accomplishments, and he will present the resolutions to the band at a concert scheduled <br />for May 18. <br />3) From his point of view, the ads in the Westlife and Sun Herald with regard to <br />Ordinance 99-54 were totally inaccurate. They crossed the line of decency and of truth. <br />He is particularly disturbed because it singles out Thomas O'Grady, an individual that he <br />has known for a long time. He wanted to go on record that, from his point of view, <br />Thomas O'Grady is a fine, outstanding individual who under no circumstances would <br />even consider taking a kickback or passing any interest through Council legislation <br />~"" benefiting any special interest group. <br />