Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 5/16/2000 <br />city to oversee that to make sure that prevailing wage is being paid. Over the last <br />decade, how many prevailing wage complaints have been filed against any union or <br />non-union contractor? Is that a concern? What ABC stands for is a notion called <br />"merit shop" which matches Ohio law. The job should go to the lowest, responsible <br />bidder. How the city defines responsible in the process utilized for evaluating bids is <br />the city's judgment. Statutory standards lay out the various types of concerns a city <br />can address to determine whether or not a contractor is not only low but responsible. <br />Those standards are incorporated, for the most part, in the American Institute of <br />Architects Contractor Qualification Statement. Is the legislation saying that any <br />contractor that is not signatory to a PLA is not responsible? If a non-union contractor <br />were to bid a project and sign a PLA and thereby require its non-union employees to <br />become members of a labor organization for the duration of the project, is that going <br />to make those workers safe? Is that going to prevent labor disputes? It will take a <br />group of non-union employees and say you have to join the union. How does that <br />change anything? Hopefully, a dialogue can continue to flesh out what the real <br />rationale for this legislation might be because it does not appear that anything in the <br />Whereas clauses, the enabling aspects of this legislation, fits with anything that is in <br />the city's legislative record up to this point. What ABC asks for is free and fair <br />competition, not one-sided competition for one group. <br />Councilman McKay: <br />• By way of response to Mr. Ross, he could tell him about a project completed in the <br />city (not a city project) which had non-union workers. The police had to visit and <br />arrest a number of people, and one of the persons arrested was a murder suspect. <br />People wondered how the place ever got built because every time the police went <br />over there, nobody was working. He doesn't believe that the unions have that kind of <br />reputation. The literature that came to his house--he takes it quite serious--accuses <br />him of giving kickbacks and many other things. That has never happened. He <br />doesn't know how Mr. Ross can stand here tonight and say that he is proud of this. <br />It really burns him up. ABC says Council is "ramming" the legislation through. <br />They don't know what they're talking about--this legislation has been considered for <br />over a year. Who are the special interest groups that are getting political kickbacks <br />from construction? He doesn't know. No Council member can give anyone a <br />kickback. It takes four people to award a contract. Where is the evidence that the <br />contracts will be given to Mr. O'Grady's political friends? Who are his political <br />friends? Where is the proof that this Council or the Mayor is using this money for <br />political kickbacks which was stated in the mailed literature. He has been on Council <br />for 19 years and has stood up and been counted whether he was right or wrong. <br />That's what he expects from the people he wants to do business with. <br />President Saringer: <br />• Earlier this evening in the caucus, she asked the sponsors of the legislation and the <br />committee if they would consider suspending the rule and passing the legislation <br />tonight. She would encourage them to do it, but it's up to them. As far as she is <br />concerned, it has been in committee and there have been several meetings and she <br /> <br />10 <br />