My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/19/2000 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
01/19/2000 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:31 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 9:50:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
1/19/2000
Year
2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NORTH OLMSTED CITY COUNCIL <br />MINIJ'TES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING <br />JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />7:30 P.M. <br />Present: Council President Saringer, Council Members Gazeau, Kasler, Limpert, <br />McKay, Nashaz, O'Qrady <br />Also Present: Mayor Musial, Law Director Gareau, Clerk of Council Seman <br />Council President Saringer called the public hearing to order at 7:35 p.m. in Council <br />Chambers, 5200 Dover Center Road, North Olmsted, Ohio. <br />President Saringer announced that the public hearing was being held with regard to <br />Ordinance No. 98-131 which provides for the amendment of the zone map in order to <br />supplememally zone parcels of real property so as to include them in the Wireless <br />Telecommunications Facilities Overlay District. She noted that these aze precautionary <br />measures and, as faz as Council is aware, there aze no plans for towers pending at this <br />time. <br />On behalf of a resident who could not attend, Presidem Saringer asked Mr. Hunt <br />(consultant) if a tower could be erected on property without the owner's consent. Mr. <br />Hunt said "no." <br />~J,~IENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Councilman Gareau <br />• Explained that resident Mr. Thomas has same concerns about the location of the <br />WTFO district and its proximity to the residential properties at the west end of town. <br />He has suggested several alternatives, one of which was reducing the district and <br />pulling it back to the high tension wire easement. This proposal was not objected to <br />by consultant, Todd Hunt. <br />John Thomas, 6096 Wild Oak Drive <br />• His proposal was to reduce the size of the area. Zoning for technology is difficult <br />because we do not know what the technology will be in a few yeazs. He does feel, <br />however, that a 200 foot height for towers has a substamial impact on businesses and <br />residences. He is concerned about the azea along Bradley Road which already does <br />have some very valuable development in the form of several businesses. It would <br />seem that, if we allow that area to be included in the overlay district, it would more <br />than likely hinder the development of the property. As Council considers this, they <br />should consider the fact that we do watrt to encourage higher quality businesses to <br />move in-businesses that aze going to want plenty of room to develop their parcels. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.