Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/4/Z001 <br />~ pretty much pay for fire and police and other general government operations, is like an <br />umbrella fund. .Anything that isn't specifically designated anywhere else goes to the <br />general operating fund. Mr. Gallagher asked if the mainrtenance of the vehicles is paid <br />for on the STOP program at all in any way. Mrs. Copfer said no, and this is an open <br />issue. The department is looking at a way to charge a fee to that. The most relevant way <br />would be to charge mileage. However, the vehicles are not driven that much. It's almost <br />an indiscernible increase of maintenance costs from before or after. She is wrestling <br />with that as there is a labor cost associated with further defining pennies. It is being <br />looked at as something to add to the cost of that program, but it has not yet been <br />determined officially. Mr. Gallagher said he does not know how anyone could say that <br />this is a self paid for program when those expenses for the vehicles, and maybe even <br />something as little as uniforms, aren't even being budgeted into that STOP program. <br />Finance Director Copfer noted the officers do not require a special uniform to work on <br />the STOP program. They wear their normal uniform which is part of their union contract <br />and is their property. <br />Councilwoman Kasler commented that Mr. Gallagher needed to understand that there has <br />to be a period of time where this program is looked at. If there is to be a charge for weaz <br />and tear and maintenance on a vehicle, Mrs. Copfer has said that is being looked into. <br />When that is determined, if it's possible to determine and if it is a figure that is <br />discernible, then it will he charged back to that fiuxl. It is importam for all to understand <br />that the revenue that is collected for that program is used not only to pay for the officers' <br />time, wages, benefits and everything that is charged to them being out on the road, but it <br />also has produced revenue that has provided for a bike patrol and provided for other <br />services to the city that then do not get charged to the general fund. <br />Safety Director Jenkins said he wanted to point out that there is a bit of an offset with <br />this. Having the extra policemen on the road does put us in a position of having a first <br />responder that perhaps is closer and more able to deal with a situation. And there have <br />been a number of occasions where an officer on the STOP program has responded to <br />something that would typically be funded out of the general fund at no cost to the general <br />fund. Those situations have resulted in some significant arrests in the City of North <br />Olmsted. <br />Cindy Clark, 23478 Olmsted Drive, expressed concern about the lack of activities in the <br />city for teenagers. The kids do not have a place to "hang." They aze not allowed to hang <br />out in the mall if they are not making purchases. She is concerned. that a library levy was <br />passed, but we can't pass a school levy to get our kids what they need because everybody <br />complains that their taxes will go up. She doesn't begrudge the senior citizens anything, <br />but we keep falling short on our kids and our kids are our future. The elected officials <br />have the power to do something about this. President Saringer noted that we do have city <br />parks and a Recreation Cemer. Councilman Limpert noted that Council and the <br />administration have been supportive of school levies. City Council does not have the <br />authority to do anything about the condition of a school building. They have tried to <br />increase facilities for youth and continue to be supportive of the schools. Councilman <br />Dailey suggested that perhaps a youth task force could be formed to look at addressing <br />8 <br /> <br />