Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 7117/01 <br />LETTERS AND CQMMjTNICATIONS <br />:~~ <br />,,:~ Correspondence was received from State Representative Dale Miller and Florizelle B. <br />Liser, Assistatrt U.S. Trade Representative for Industry and Telecommunications, <br />acknowledging the legislation Council recently adopted with regard to the steel industry. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Tom Hreha, 6418 Surrey Drive, spoke in support of the legislation which would place a <br />Charter amendment on the ballot to allow for non-partisan elections. Mr. Hreha noted it <br />would not go into effect unti12003, so it would not affect this election and no candidate <br />would benefit from it. Non-partisan elections simply means that party affiliation is no <br />longer printed on the ballot. There are only six communities in Cuyahoga County that <br />currerrtly have partisan elections. Non-partisan elections would allow federal <br />governmem employees, who are prohibited from running in partisan elections by the <br />Hatch Act, to be candidates for election in North Olmsted. We have hundreds of <br />residents who aze federal employees, and non-partisan elections would open up this talent <br />pool. He would like Council to reconsider the decision to keep the legislation in <br />committee and place the issue on the ballot for the citizens to decide. <br />Councilman McKay commented that it is not the City Council of North Olmsted that <br />prevents federal employees from being candidates. It is the federal government that is <br />restricting them If citizens want to change this, they have the opportunity to put it on the <br />ballot by petition. He is not going to make himself a liar because somebody warns him to <br />run in anon-partisan election and say that he does not have any politics. He is proud to <br />be a Democrat and has always been truthful about his political affiliation. <br />Bill Kelley, 4161 Canterbury Road, commented that the recommendation regazding non- <br />partisan elections was not a unanimous decision from the Charter Review Commission. <br />As a member of the commission and a Democrat, he voted against it as did the <br />chairperson of the commission who is a Republican. He believes that calling elections <br />non-partisan does not remove partisanship from elections. <br />Councilman Limpert commented that, as he understands it, non-partisan does not mean <br />that a candidate cannot indicate party affiliation on campaign literature or signs. <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said the Charter gives a distinct advantage to party <br />affiliated candidates versus non-partisan candidates. There aze people in the community <br />who might not want to contribute to a particular political party. They just want to use <br />their talents to benefit their community. Council is not being asked to condone non- <br />partisan elections but only to let the people vote on it. It is about giving the people the <br />choice. <br />Shannon Hoff-Smith, 5113 Hampton Drive, spoke as a representative of the Citizens for <br />Non-partisan Elections Committee. The committee is a coalition of Democratic, <br />Republican and Independent citizens fighting to have their right to participate and the <br />democratic process restored. The committee will be circulating petitions to have an issue <br />7 <br />