My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/19/2001 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
06/19/2001 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:39 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 10:25:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/19/2001
Year
2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 6/19/2001 <br />docks will be on the southwest side of the store. The parking lights will be 25 feet <br />tall from the base up, and the wattage is to be no more than 400 watts. The building <br />material will be a white split-faced brick on all four sides. This will be an all-brick <br />building with red Tops signs on the south and on the east side of the building. The <br />property is owned by Kimco Realty. There will be all new landscaping along <br />Brookpark Road extension. Mr. Olson said that there would be a traffic light study; <br />and, if the warrants are met, a traffic light would be installed at Tops' expense. Mr. <br />Olson also said that he would meet with the City Engineer to make necessary <br />improvements for the retention basin along the north side of the property. The entire <br />project is estimated to cost approximately $10 million. After discussion, the <br />committee unanimously recommended approval of the Tops Market proposal subject <br />to the recommendations of the various boards and commissions of the city. Mr. <br />Nashar moved that Council approve the proposal for Tops Market subject to the <br />recommendations of the boards and commissions. Mr. O'Grady said he believed in <br />addition to the 57,000 square foot building there would be another retail store at the <br />southern end of approximately 25,000 square feet, with a total reduction of retail <br />space of about 30,000 square feet. Mr. Nashar said he understood the other retail <br />would be brought up at another time. Mr. O'Grady seconded the motion. Roll call: <br />Nashar, yes; O'Grady, yes; Kasler, yes; Limpert, yes; with the comment that he <br />would like to compliment Tops for working with the neighbors in the area. This <br />redevelopment is accomplishing several things: a 25% reduction in retail space in the <br />area, greater buffering for the residents, more green space. Roll call continued: <br />McKay, yes; Miller, yes, with comment that he too would compliment Tops in their <br />working with the community and the immediate neighbors. He would caution, <br />however, when saying there is a reduction in retail space, there will also be an <br />increase in traffic. He has a concern about the increased traffic, but noted that the <br />Traffic Engineer has said that the city's best efforts are in place with consideration of <br />the traffic light. Before the vote was announced by President Saringer, Mr. Nashar <br />asked if Mr. Olson, represernative from Tops, could come forward to make a <br />statement. President Saringer invited Mr. Olson to come forward. Mr. Olson stated <br />that he thought the approval was for the Tops building and the conceptual approval <br />for the additional retail. He understood it to be the plan as presented at the committee <br />meeting for the conceptual approval for the site plan which had a block of retail plus <br />the out-parcel building. Mr. O'Grady said that is the way he understood it as well. <br />Mr. Nashar said he thought the additional retail would be presented as a separate <br />issue at another time. However, he accepted Mr. Olson's statemern and said he <br />would withdraw his motion. Mr. O'Grady withdrew his second. Mr. Miller asked the <br />Law Director for clarification. Law Director Gareau stated that it had been presented <br />to the Board of Zoning Appeals as one project. The BZA had worked through all of <br />the various concepts, both with the Tops store, the other retail stores and they had <br />even discussed the out-building to the east. He believes it was being presented to <br />Council as a total project. Mr. Olson clarified that all the buildings are under one <br />parcel, including the out-parcel. With the first motion withdrawn, Mr. Nashar moved <br />that Council accept the Tops proposal as preserved to the BZD Committee which <br />includes the Tops building, other future retail and an out-building. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. O'Grady and unanimously approved. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.