My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/07/2003 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
01/07/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:28 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:00:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
1/7/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 1/7!2003 <br />city but instead to be the attorney for the city. In the course of writing the opinion he <br />read again a federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case which questioned whether, in <br />light of the public's demand for open and honest government, city officials should be <br />entitled to even assert attorney/client privilege regarding communications with which <br />they make with the city attorney. He has practiced. law for 23 years, and the concept <br />of attorney/client privilege and what it means historically in the development of <br />common law is sacred to lawyers. Apparently, some very important people believe <br />that there are higher values than attorney/client privilege and one of them, according <br />to the Sixth Circuit, is open and honest government. Even so much so that the court <br />is willing to say that there is no attorney/client privilege between city officials <br />perhaps and their attorney when it comes to making sure that the public receives open <br />and honest government. It is important to consider in 2003 to do things to promote <br />open and honest government in the City of North Olmsted. We need to have more <br />open and honest communications between all members of the administration, <br />including himself, and the City Council. These communications, whenever possible, <br />should be made at open meetings. There is really nothing to hide. Local government <br />seems to work best when everybody, the Council, the administration and the members <br />of the public know what is going on. He would also urge Council to complete the <br />process of creating and keeping good minutes of all public meetings of every city <br />body including Council committee meetings. He agrees with the President of Council <br />on the issue of exploring the idea of televising Council meetings and perhaps even <br />other bodies and commissions of the city. The city should try to plan ahead for 2003. <br />This year, five of our seven collective bargaining agreements will terminate. We do <br />need to begin addressing important issues regarding these contracts, and health care <br />coverage is an especially big issue. The master plan for the Planning Commission is <br />due to be completed by June 2004. In order to get that master plan completed and <br />approved by City Council for June of 2004, it takes getting it well under way in 2003 . <br />Budgeting for it is required this year and also some special attention as to what the <br />focus of the master plan should be. As the Mayor pointed out in his report, <br />Stearns/Crocker extension is very critical. It will have a dramatic impact on the west <br />end of town. It may indirectly have an impact on the mall. The city records <br />commission should meet this year, especially in light of all the discussions we had on <br />public records issues in 2002. The public records commission is an administrative <br />responsibility. The two vacancies on the city's Fair Housing Board should be filled, <br />and the board should meet in 2003 to address any fair housing issues and needs that <br />the city may have. The city's organizational chart should be comprehensively <br />reviewed and appropriate legislation requested to insure that there is accountability <br />for the existence of every city position, bargaining and non-bargaining. Council is <br />urged to consider passing the RFP legislation, Ordinance 2002-72. In his opinion, <br />this is simply good government legislation. It's consistent with the Charter's <br />apportionment of responsibility between the administration and the Council on all <br />city contracts. He believes that Council's responsibility is to establish good <br />procedures for the entering into of contracts, including professional service contracts. <br />It's thereafter the responsibility of the administration to follow Council's established <br />process and select the best contractor price-wise and quality-wise. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.