Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/19/2004 <br />make a decision. They can live with that, but this has gone way past a labor dispute. <br />.~,~. Members have been harassed, threatened with termination, and threatened with <br />retaliation. Currently, they have approximately 12 outstanding grievances. It seems now <br />to be city policy to make them grieve everything rather than try to reach a solution. The <br />Fire Chief has taken a stance that, if anything is not specifically listed in the collective <br />bargaining agreement, then it belongs to management rights. That is not correct. But <br />even agreements reached through collective bargaining are not being honored. They will <br />be happy to let a third party decide those issues. For some reason the administration has <br />found it necessary to operate by means of threats and force. This administration has <br />found it necessary to demand respect but not give respect. Fire fighters not supporting <br />the proposed bond issue for the new station have been threatened, and they have been <br />threatened because of bumper stickers in support of presidential candidate John Kerry. <br />Grievances cost both the union and the city money. With regard to the contract, it <br />appears things are finally coming to a close. Last week he saw what he personally <br />believes to be the most harmful and detrimental thing ever done by this city. Through <br />negotiations they agreed to an employee health care committee. The city has been <br />pushing to begin the process of the committee even though all bargaining unit cycles are <br />not complete. Have been pushed to begin the process and when finally agreed, the city <br />notified people the union invited that they cannot participate unless the city agrees. This <br />is an employee committee with employee advisors and facilitators. How is it that the city <br />is advising or facilitating when the actions of the city so far have been to hinder and <br />interfere? It doesn't make sense to bargain in good faith, agree to changes, push and <br />demand that the committee begin meeting and then stand in the way of that committee. <br />Mr. Dubelko has told the committee they have the right to invite whoever they want. He <br />is not sure if they should file another grievance or an unfair labor practice for bargaining <br />in bad faith. What he would like is an apology. That goes a long way and paves the way <br />for better relationships. If they were to make a mistake or didn't have the right to request <br />a meeting, then they would apologize for their actions and promise not to try and repeat <br />the actions. Once again, they hear that 5pringvale is looking at another deficit, which <br />will most likely have to be fixed by the General Fund. Will city services be cut because <br />of this never-ending annual shortfall? In an effort to save money, he suggests that <br />Council stop hiring outside counsel to represent the city. Regarding grievances, allow <br />SERB to make a ruling of probable cause or not with regards to all three pending unfair <br />labor practices. That should be a good indicator of the validity of the grievances and <br />whether these grievances should proceed. Lastly, sell Springvale and cut our losses. All <br />the fire fighters are asking for is that the city honor its signed agreements-no threats, no <br />harassment. <br />Law Director Dubelko advised Council that they should not comment on unresolved <br />contracts. There is a process in place sanctioned by SERB to resolve contract <br />differences. Secondly, with respect to pending grievances, those are in the pipeline and <br />will be heard by an arbitrator. He wouldn't want Council comments to find their way to <br />the arbitrator for purposes of deciding those issues. He recommends no comments on <br />those two issues. <br />9 <br />