My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/05/2004 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
10/05/2004 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:33 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:32:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
10/5/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 10/5/2004 <br />passed in the early 1990's to expand the real property maintenance program to residential <br />properties. The current procedure that's in place is a complaint, followed by a personal <br />introduction to the subject who is being potentially violated to seek aresolution-that is, <br />they usually try to get a voluntary date of compliance usually within one week. After <br />that, there is a written notice if non-compliance after one week. There will then be a re- <br />inspection. If after the re-inspection the matter is not resolved, it is sent to the Law Dept. <br />for further legal action. After it goes to the Law Dept., a letter is sent and at that point, if <br />they don't comply within a period of 10 days, a matter will be commenced in the Rocky <br />River Municipal Court to seek enforcement and prosecution of the person who has <br />violated the property maintenance code. Our property maintenance inspector Mr. <br />Schneider stated the procedure is currently reactive in nature. That is, we respond to <br />complaints. There is no current patrolling of the city for problems which occurs in other <br />communities. Mr. Schneider indicated that the rate of work he currently is doing which <br />includes backlogs and getting through current inspections, does not allow much in the <br />way of proactive policing of the city for problems in property maintenance. Mr. Conway <br />commented that Mr. Schneider is currently one of the earliest in and one of the last <br />people out each day. He noted that he is a North Olmsted resident who takes his job <br />extremely seriously. Nobody in the room was questioning the job of Mr. Schneider. <br />Since being brought on board, he has made a difference and his heart is in this job fully. <br />Mr. Schneider commented that it was more than afull-time job. He currently has 60 <br />active cases although he is to be technically apart-time property maintenance enforcer. <br />He also stated it is a very paper-intensive position. He does some of the paperwork on <br />his own, and he does get some assistance from the secretary in the Building Dept. Mr. <br />Conway remarked that he believed the city needed afull-time property maintenance <br />inspector in order to keep up with just the reactive component of our code, responding to <br />complaints. He indicated that, if the City Council or the administration was inclined to <br />be more proactive, that is to go out looking for violations instead of just simply <br />investigating complaints, it's just simply going to have to take more manpower. Mr. <br />Schneider did comment that he believes the code is vague to some extent. That <br />complaint has been heard before. One member of Council pointed out that there wasn't <br />any vagueness when somebody else was enforcing it, and we hadn't heard about it up <br />until now. The committee felt the current pending Ordinance 2004-80 may be of some <br />assistance to clarify some of that vagueness so that the code maybe more easily enforced. <br />Mr. Dubelko remarked that the Law Dept. in 2004 had eight actions in the Rocky River <br />Municipal Court concerning property maintenance. Five of those actions were <br />convictions, two were pending and one was dismissed. When the letter is first sent out <br />prior to actually commencing prosecution, a demand letter is sent. Seventeen demand <br />letters for compliance were issued in July and August alone. Resident Jim Kennedy, who <br />happens to be in charge of the division of property maintenance in Fairview Park, noted <br />that the lack of manpower and the reactive nature of our system was a problem. He felt <br />that it was diminishing the attractiveness of the City of North Olmsted because we are not <br />keeping up on people who fail to maintain their properties. He noted that recent statistics <br />compiled by our Planning Director reflect a downward trend in housing valuation, <br />downward trend in condition and rate of appreciation and that concerned him. He <br />compared those statistics to surrounding communities, which was included in Ms. <br />'~' Wenger's compilation. He believes property maintenance, or the lack thereof, is playing <br />~,::. <br />11 <br />~,.4n~~,~, ~._. .. <br />„~ ... ~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.