Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/6/2005 <br />We have also posted a request for information on our website and cable channel asking our <br />residents to inform us regarding who was affected, and to what extent. Once compiled, we will <br />analyze that data to look for problem locations. These problem locations will be scrutinized to <br />ensure that city drainage systems are operating properly. If there is a city problem, we will <br />correct it. If not, we will direct our attention towards correcting shortcomings on private <br />property. <br />I know that we cannot build an infrastructure large enough to handle storm water flooding in <br />these extreme instances. However, it is my intent to reduce or eliminate the instances of sanitary <br />flooding. We have done much over these past ten years to ensure that city systems are <br />structurally sound, and that there is no infiltration of storm water into sanitary. The next step in <br />this direction involves our property owners and the potential for dye tests, where indicated. <br />If you are aware of others who were affected and have not yet contacted us, please advise them <br />to call our Service Department (440-716-4151) so that we can add them to our data base. We <br />need: Name, Address, Phone Number, Amount of Water, and whether the water entered through <br />the walls or up through a floor drain. Thank you for your understanding in this emergency. <br />Please feel free to contact me directly if you desire." <br />Councilman Barker inquired as to the number of residents who have called in so far. Mayor <br />O'Grady answered there have been 417 total complaints, and of significance 155 were either <br />sanitary or a combination of sanitary and storm. Councilman Baker noted that there were 81 <br />residents in the Deerfield development and explained that the Hall ditch has been a problem that <br />he and the previous two ward Councilmen have attempted to rectify. <br />Councilman Tallon commented in regard to the Hall ditch that in past years he knew there were <br />problems with the City of Westlake over cleaning their access ditches from North Olmsted. The <br />EPA addressed this and said, in no uncertain terms, that Westlake is responsible for keeping that <br />ditch open and clear for the water to flow in its natural habitat. If we have something worked out <br />with Westlake, that is fine. If not, he strongly urges the Mayor to contact the EPA and get that <br />worked out. Mayor O'Grady said that over the last year or so Westlake has been responsive to <br />those types of issues, and the need for a joint effort was emphasized during the storm event. He <br />does think things are going in the right direction. <br />Councilman Miller said there are some areas of the city where historically we flood whether it is <br />a moderate rain or a very, very heavy rain. One of areas is at the north end of Dover Center in <br />the area called the Ehle ditch wherein it meets Westlake. At one time in that ditch, Westlake <br />installed a wedge or a dam in the ditch to hold North Olmsted's water back so that Westlake's <br />could flow freely. He understands that wedge still exists. If the relationship with Westlake has <br />improved, if that water can be made to flow freely, as he understands it is required to be, this <br />may solve some of the problems in the Edgepark, Blossom, Laurell Woods and Forestwood <br />developments. He asked that the area be added to the list to be looked at. Mayor O'Grady said <br />he would ask the Service Director to look into the Ehle ditch. The administration is aware of <br />certain areas that have flooding problems. It is a tribute to the members of Council who over <br />these past 10 to 15 years have done so much to reduce or eliminate flooding in so many parts of <br />town. In past years, any rain event would produce significant flooding. We've come a long way <br />7 <br />