My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/06/2005 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
09/06/2005 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:49:34 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 9:02:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/6/2005
Year
2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/6/2005 <br />® • Case of Jennifer Pauley v. the City of North Olmsted, EEOC, charge No. 220205853. <br />This was a complaint filed by a former secretary to a former safety director contending <br />that her firing was retaliatory. The EEOC has investigated the matter and has issued a <br />dismissal notice on August 24. The complainant now has 90 days to bring an action in <br />court. <br />2) In August, the Prosecutor handled 283 cases, and 71 were general offenses and the balance <br />were traffic matters. There were two trials held, and convictions were obtained in both. He is <br />batting 1000% with trying cases in Rocky River Court, which is continued bad news for criminal <br />defendants. <br />3) Attended an Ethics Commission meeting on August 17. Attended meetings for the Board of <br />Tax Review on August 18 and 25 and the Fair Housing Review Board on August 25. <br />4} Met with the architect for the new fire station on August 22 and his attorney regarding final <br />language for the contract for his professional services. Hopefully, that will conclude this week. <br />On August 24, the city opened an escrow account with Chicago Title for the real estate purchase <br />transaction. He expects the land to be titled to the city by October. On August 25, he met with <br />administrative officials to coordinate matters relating to architectural services for the new fire <br />station. <br />5) August 25 through 28, along with Mayor, Council, members of administration, participated in <br />the Homecoming. It was a very good 4-day event, and a good time was had by all. <br />6) Spent August 29 with the city's fire fighters. Attended labor/management meeting in the <br />afternoon with FMCS mediator Viscocill and attended a safe staffing meeting in the evening. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) Council and directors have July's month-end reports. She began to <br />analyze June and got caught up in budget issues to get transfer ordinance ready-never gat to the <br />point to give an informed answer to Mr. Miller's question of an estimated unencumbered <br />balance. She will provide it as soon as possible. <br />2) Involved with the Board of Review on a taxpayer appeal case. Thanks to Council for moving <br />forward on outside counsel this evening. <br />3) She and Kim Wenger met with Emerald Village regarding the possibility of utilizing a <br />financing vehicle similar to industrial revenue bonds that utilize the city's capacity to borrow at a <br />tax exempt status. This issue was discussed with bond counsel. Even though it does not put the <br />city at risk for the debt payments or any associated fees, there is a question regarding how much <br />of our bank qualified $10 million that we're allowed to utilize at a tax exempt rate City Council <br />would be willing to forego if it's unused. We pretty much know 2005 that there is nothing <br />unexpected that we need. But they want a projection for 2006, which we're not prepared to do <br />and have informed them of that. This was just an introductory fact-finding meeting. She <br />informed them anything the city would be willing to do would definitely go through the Council <br />process and may also involve the use of a dormant community improvement corp. <br />4) With Cheryl Farver, met with Kevin Bang of Master Benefits and then met with the health <br />care committee to discuss renewal proposals and timelines. The timeline is tight since we expect <br />these proposals to be a starting point, and then the committee expects to review and revise <br />benefits if necessary to meet their required goal of cost containment. She appreciates Council's <br />suspension of the rules on this issue so we can move forward. <br />r,, <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.