My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2007 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
11/20/2007 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:08 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 9:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
11/20/2007
Year
2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 11/20/2007 <br />the Mayor sat through two meetings and never made one comment about any of this. <br />This is up to the Mayor's discretion whether he wants to use them or not. This is a tool <br />being put in the Mayor's arsenal to try to protect the wages of people who are struggling. <br />He doesn't see what the problem is, and that's why he votes no. Roll call continued: <br />Barker, yes; Orlowski, no; Tallon, no. The motion failed with four no votes and three yes <br />votes. <br />Responding to Councilman Ryan's comments, Mayor O'Grady said he did sit through <br />meetings and did comment. He feels the changes made in committee were unwise. <br />Reducing the amount for consideration for PLA down to $100,000 is putting it on a level <br />where perhaps PLAs are unrealistic. He thinks the legislation was good as it was, and the <br />changes made damaged the legislation. He thinks it should be reconsidered. Councilman <br />Ryan said he had the opportunity to talk to several union leaders who seemed to be in <br />agreement with this. They were very satisfied this was a good way to protect our union <br />workers here in northern Ohio. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />1} Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, spoke about Ordinance 2007-123 which <br />represents a sewer increase. Whether it's going to do the job is doubtful, and that is his <br />concern. He attended the meeting where the presentation of the assessment of our sewer <br />plant was made and felt it was not a broad enough assessment. It does not address the <br />inflow and infiltration problems that the people north of Lorain and lower level areas are <br />going to be facing. Those people are still going to have pumps in their front yards. The <br />study was based on a comparison of the Regional Sewer District to this district, and did <br />not have a comparison with the Rocky River and Lakewood sewer plants. To him, that <br />says the information isn't that accurate. There is also the consideration of whether the <br />sewer plant will be rebuilt just as it is or if other alternative measures are being <br />considered. For instance, channeling some of the sewage at the lower end through Rocky <br />River and developing hookups with that so that the sewer flows its natural path downhill, <br />instead of uphill through lift stations. This would alleviate two problems: (a) the <br />flooding In the lower-lying areas of North Olmsted; (b) the requirement for having the <br />same size sewer plant with the same output facility into what's basically a rather small <br />stream, having to meet critical EPA standards when Rocky River is dumping their <br />sewage out into the lake where it's almost immeasurable whatever their bacteria levels <br />and solids are. This all needs to be considered and studied. He suggests this not be <br />passed until the right approach is determined. There's no doubt in his mind that that <br />sewer plant needs something done with it. But there's a lot of doubt in his mind that the <br />project the city is about to undertake is (a) going to solve the problems that you want to <br />solve and (b) going to get the job done for this amount of money and possibly more. It's <br />going to be a big waste of money if it fails. <br />Mayor O'Grady said this is a sewer rate increase. He believes either Mr. Lambert either <br />misunderstood or did not quite take the time needed to study the issue and study the work <br />that has been done by professionals. What has been presented to Council is a very <br />professional work that continues the good story that this city has to tell about our WWTP. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.