Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/2/2007 <br /> <br />LETTERS AND COMMUNICA.TI4NS <br />Per the request of resident Dennis Lambert, the Clerk read a letter received by him from <br />Council President Kennedy and his response to the letter: <br />"Dear Mr. Lambert: It has come to my attention that, during the course of Council <br />discussion last night, you left your seat in the audience, approached the dais, and spoke <br />with members of Council. Such conduct is disruptive to the process. Please be advised <br />that in the future you are not to speak or approach the dais unless given permission by <br />me. This rule-which you know well-preserves decorum and ensures an orderly <br />process. I trust that this letter will be sufficient notice for you to tailor your future <br />conduct. Sincerely yours, Kevin M. Kennedy, President of Council" <br />"Dear President Kennedy: I received your Letter of Concern, dated September 19, 2007, <br />wherein you noted that I had left my seat and approached the dais and spoke with a <br />member of Council during the meeting of September 17t". (September 18) You further <br />stated that my conduct was disruptive to the process. There is no doubt as President of <br />Council, you are charged with the responsibility of keeping the order and administering <br />the rules. I do, however, have some concerns with the disparity and the dichotomy by <br />which you perform your duties. In your letter you state, `It has been brought to my <br />attention...' That statement in of itself indicates that at that time, you did not consider <br />my presence disruptive. Had you noticed me at the dais and had I been disruptive, you <br />should have spoken to me, just as you have done to others in the past. It should also be <br />noted that routinely throughout these formal meetings of council, members of Council get <br />up, move about, and have private discussions among themselves while reports and other <br />business transpire; thereby, depriving the public of an opportunity to hear and have on the <br />record all that is being transacted during these formal meetings. During the Council <br />Meeting on August 21St, Councilman Michael Gareau without permission of the chair got <br />up during Council reports and left the room. I observed him talking to representatives of <br />Walter Dentistry just outside of the chambers. Since Mr. Gareau was formally in <br />attendance at that meeting, his actions and conversations should have been part of the <br />meeting minutes. They were not. It should also be noted for the record, I approached <br />Councilman Ryan during a period of time when council was waiting silently for Law <br />Director Dubelko as he was paging though the Rules of Council to determine an issue of <br />protocol regarding motions. I was careful not to be disruptive. It should also be noted <br />that I have been attending City Council Meetings regularly since 1993 and do not recall <br />you being present at anytime except just before your appointment as President to replace <br />Thomas O'Grady. Therefore, you would not be aware that in the past, on rare occasions, <br />I would approach the dais and none of the three prior presidents expressed a problem to <br />me. This does not detract from the position that you now take in your letter dated <br />September 19`" ;however, be aware that you set the standards by which all of us conduct <br />ourselves during these meetings. These standards should not be applied with disparity <br />but with consistency and not only among those who are observers, but among all wha <br />participate in these formal meetings. It is up to you to establish, by example, how <br />formally you want these meetings to run. I find the motivation for your September 19tH <br />letter to be a bit surprising and suspicious since in the past you have had no problems <br />speaking to me. Regarding the issue of the one-minute discussion I had with Councilman <br />10 <br /> <br />