My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/02/2007 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
10/02/2007 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:11 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 10:01:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
10/2/2007
Year
2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~a, - <br /> <br />Elevation of Wall with climbing plants and trees <br /> <br />*- ~ . <br />~~ <br />Sections of Corridor with Walls <br />Corridor Sound Walls <br />r~ ~ SauD M <br />~ a~7 S S~ <br />The sound walls will be installed as part of the corridor construction. The issue at hand is how to mitigate the negative <br />impacts of this wall. The wall will be placed approximately 14' from the curb of the new road. This distance will include both <br />a sidewalk and a small tree lawn. Emphasis should be placed on both masking the appearance of wall and creating a more <br />comfortable environment for pedestrians. To address both conditions, vegetation is the most pragmatic solution. <br />The sound wall is constructed of precast pieces of concrete which are slid into armatures. There are a range of possibilities <br />to "green" this wall in an effort to improve its appearance and allow it to absorb more sound. Planting climbing plants at the <br />base of the wall that could climb the wall without structural support is the easiest option. Plant choices include Ivy, Trumpet <br />Vine or Euonymous Fortunii. These plants use adhesive suckers or root hairs to attach to structures, and although they are <br />known to cause damage to masonry structures with grouted joints, their perceived impact on the concrete panels would be <br />minimal. A second option would involve the attachment of a support structure for the plants to climb up. The placement of <br />these supports would depend upon plant species, but would greatly expand vegetation options to include plants such as <br />Wisteria, Clematis and Vitus. In either option, low-maintenance, salt-tolerant plant materials should be selected. <br />The tree lawns between the sidewalk and the street along the corridor could support a range of small trees which would <br />improve the appearance of the corridor for pedestrians and motorist. Flowering species would have the greatest impact, but <br />salt-tolerant, non-fruit bearing cultivars must be selected to reduce maintenance requirements. A sterile flowering crabapple <br />tree, such as Malus `Spring Snow' or anon-fruit-beating tree such as a Western Redbud (Cercis occidentalis) are among the <br />possibilities. These trees require watering when first planted, but are low-maintenance once they are established. <br />The wall stops at the northern boundary of the city. At this point there exists a possibility to create and east/west connection <br />between Bradley Woods and the residential community to the east by extending North Park Drive. This connection would <br />allow pedestrian and vehicular access into Bradley Woods, but could be configured to prevent motorists from using Bradley <br />Woods as acut-through route. The connection to the residential community to the east of Steams would be a pedestrian- <br />only connection. This connection should have a stoplight and crosswalk, which could serve as a traffic calming measure in <br />the northern part of the corridor. <br />City of North Olmsted: Crocker-Stearns Corridor <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.