My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/2008 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
12/16/2008 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:25 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:04:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/16/2008
Year
2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/16/2008 <br />frenzy off of one another to solve the problems that actually originated at the top of this <br />structure. He believes the Mayor's motto of doing more with less was defeatist. We <br />should be doing more with more. For years, he has been making suggestions and has <br />been ignored. He believes the city's land management has been a disaster. It's the land <br />management and the taxes from that land that would have paid for these jobs. We have <br />$8 million in debt service, and we have a $2 million shortfall. Without that debt service, <br />we would have $6 million in the bank. This city has been grossly mismanaged. It's all <br />been puff and fluff and no sound business practices. Regarding the Crocker-Stearns <br />extension-it will take business from this community and ship it to Westlake. He noted <br />that Westlake will not extend Route 2S2 which would bring traffic by Great Northern. <br />He does not want to see any cuts in service or in the safety departments. He wondered if <br />we need a CLS Director or a Planning Dept. We're cutting staff and we're not using <br />good business practices and we're not doing it with priority. Most importantly, he <br />doesn't don't want to see a feeding frenzy of one to the other. We need to demand solid <br />business practices from the top so that the citizens get the services they need and the <br />protection they need. <br />Mayor O'Grady said that, when he campaigned for the office three and a half years ago, <br />he said we had to reduce the size of government. We are now a much smaller, more <br />efficient government through attrition and reorganization and our services have <br />increased. Trying to lay the debt service at this administration's feet is absolutely <br />ludicrous. If we didn't have that debt service, we wouldn't be borrowing to do our roads. <br />We wouldn't be facing this crisis now. That is accurate. But that debt came from the <br />1980's when the Council looked at people who were flooding in their homes and decided <br />to spend an outrageous amount of money, too much at the time. But how can he possibly <br />criticize them when he wasn't here then and can't say he looked into the faces of people <br />who had water in their homes. Perhaps they should have taken more time then, but that is <br />what we are dealing with. The truth is, through sound fiscal management of the Finance <br />Director and himself, through reorganization, we are taking that debt down. During the <br />next term, a huge portion of that debt will fall off. When it does, there will be more we <br />can do for our citizens. <br />11) Bee Sidaway, 28675 Holly, a resident for 49 '/Z years. Her grandson is one of the <br />safety people being laid off, and he is devastated and angry. She questioned why the <br />layoff notices were sent out by letter just before Thanksgiving. The employees didn't <br />even receive the courtesy of being told face to face. These are men and women who have <br />been well trained for their jobs and are necessary to keep the city safe. She read in the <br />newspaper a statement that the people of North Olmsted will still be safely served by <br />their safety forces in spite of the reduction. But will this service be as quick as it would <br />have been before this reduction in forces? Will the departments have to pay overtime to <br />overworked officers to keep up this good service? Is the budget geared for this? In <br />March of 2007, there were S7 policeman. Now with retirements and the layoffs, the total <br />number will be 48. That is close to 19% in less than two years. There's constant <br />encouragement to new companies to locate here. What new business will want to settle in <br />North Olmsted when they find out that there are layoffs in these vital safety areas? Who <br />will want to locate in a city that is as broke as ours appears to be? A city which has a <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.