My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/04/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
08/04/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:51 AM
Creation date
1/7/2014 3:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/4/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes of 8/4!2009 <br />housing program thanks in large part to Councilwoman Jones and to our Fair Housing Administrator <br />Carole Heyward. They do a really good job with the program. It really has made a difference to our <br />community opening up housing to everyone. Fair housing is a way of addressing a myriad of potential <br />housing problems in the city including foreclosures and vacancies. It's a good program, and we have <br />done well. <br />5) At the last Council meeting in June, he issued anoff-the-cuff opinion that legislation that was <br />sponsored by an individual could not go forward before Council if that person, in this case being the <br />Mayor, withdrew his sponsorship. His off-the-cuff opinion was wrong. After research, he learned the <br />distinction between the concept of introduction of legislation and the concept of sponsorship. He <br />provided City Council with a formal legal opinion. He would still encourage Council to get some <br />rules on sponsorship as to who can jump onto bills and who can jump off and when and who can <br />control what. Those rules would be beneficial. Nevertheless, there is no support in the law, in our <br />Charter, or in state or federal law for concluding that, once a bill or ordinance is introduced, somehow <br />it cannot go through the legislative process to completion because a sponsor withdraws support. <br />6) One of our law clerks, Danja Therecka, who has done a great job for the city the last year and a half, <br />took the bar exam in Columbus last week. Hopefully, she did well. <br />Mayor O'Grady commented that he would like to highlight some of the comments that the Law <br />Director made with regard to the appeal of the fire fighter litigation. It was a worthy effort. The <br />collective bargaining agreement is established so that the administration and the fire fighter union have <br />specific structure within which to operate. If either side, the city administration or the fire fighters, <br />choose to operate outside of the collective bargaining agreement, it can be very damaging. And, in <br />fact, it is very wrong. So it was a worthy effort. He thinks a testimony to that worthiness is the fact <br />that the Ohio Municipal League chose to file an amicus brief along with the city to stress their <br />objections to the previous ruling. The ruling is what it is; the Supreme Court made the decision that <br />they made. But it was a worthy effort, and he commends the Law Director and Assistant Law Director <br />O'Malley for their efforts in this regard. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) The CAFR has been sitting waiting to be submitted to the state and <br />GFOA since mid June. Our auditors, Ciuni & Panichi, received a notice from the Auditor of State <br />asking the city to obtain a 30 day extension from the GFOA because the AOS could not issue the <br />SAS 70 report on internal controls for the City of Cleveland Division of Water, which our auditors <br />rely on when expressing an opinion for the Sewer Revenue Fund. This has affected numerous <br />municipalities, including those that just buy the meter readings and actually do their own billing. At <br />the end of July, we were asked to obtain another extension for the same reason. She is extremely <br />annoyed by this because last year we were on hold because of the county corruption case that was <br />unfolding, and now we are on hold because of the Cleveland Division of Water's controls. She is told <br />the report should be issued within a week, so she is hopeful this will be a moot point by the end of the <br />month. <br />2) Jim Dubelko, Amy Arrigi the RITA legal counsel, and she met to discuss the process they should <br />develop to pursue RITA non-responders to the annual subpoena program. The other cities in the <br />Rocky River Court expressed interest in being involved, so the next step is having a meeting with the <br />court, law and finance departments of the various cities, and RITA to develop a streamlined, <br />automated process to serve all the needs. Ideas discussed involved an amnesty program for non- <br />responders to clear a little bit of those who would like to be brought current to reduce the over 2,000 <br />non-responders we in North Olmsted alone had for the last subpoena program. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.