My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/16/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
06/16/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:51 AM
Creation date
1/7/2014 3:30:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/16/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 6/16/2009 <br />certainly, because nothing gets passed without Council. These two pieces of legislation <br />are not being sponsored by him. Place them on the table. When the time is right with <br />both issues and we have a clear picture of what direction to go, then we can bring them <br />back in whatever correct form there should be. In his view, this is becoming a tempest in <br />a teapot. Quite frankly, it's dated information. Put it on the table, bring it back in its <br />proper form at the proper time. Councilman Barker stated that he has been coming to <br />meetings since 1998. He will agree with what the Law Director said that there are times <br />when co-sponsors have removed or added their names to legislation. But he has never <br />heard of legislation sponsored by one person, and that person removing their name from <br />the legislation. President Kennedy called for a halt to the discussion and a decision be <br />made. Removing it from the agenda and putting it back into committee so it can be <br />further discussed would be a fine option. Councilman Gareau said it seems like there's <br />an additional way to table legislation-by virtue of simply withdrawing sponsorship. Is <br />that the legal effect? Is it dead by virtue of the Mayor's withdrawal of sponsorship? <br />Because the further action would be, Council is being told they have to table it. What if <br />nobody else wants to sponsor it? Law Director Dubelko answered, if Council wants to <br />keep it alive, he would think somebody would sponsor it. Councilman Gareau made a <br />motion to remove Ordinance 2007-135 from the agenda and place it back into committee. <br />Law Director Dubelko said that did not deal with his objection to it. The motion was <br />seconded by Councilman Kearney and passed unanimously. Ordinance No. 2007-135 <br />was removed from the agenda and placed back into committee. <br />Councilman Gareau made a motion to remove Ordinance 2009-6 from second reading <br />and send it back to committee. The motion was seconded by Councilman Barker and <br />passed unanimously. Ordinance No. 2009-6 was removed from the agenda and placed <br />back into committee. <br />Resolution No. 2009-59 introduced by Mayor O'Grady was given its second reading. A <br />resolution authorizing the Cuyahoga County Public Library to make structural changes to <br />the North Olmsted library building located at 27403 Lorain Road, and declaring an <br />emergency. Councilman Mahoney moved for suspension of the rule requiring three <br />readings for the reasons indicated at caucus and for the purposes of timeliness. The <br />motion was seconded by Councilman Brossard and passed unanimously. Councilman <br />Mahoney moved for adoption. The motion was seconded by Councilman Kearney and <br />passed unanimously. Resolution No. 2009-59 adopted. <br />Resolution No. 2009-71 introduced by Mayor O'Grady was given its second reading. A <br />resolution extending for a second additional one year period the city's contract with <br />Silverlode Consulting Corp. for the purpose of providing economic development <br />consulting services to the city, and declaring an emergency. Councilman Gareau moved <br />for suspension of the rule requiring three readings noting it was reviewed in committee. <br />The reason for suspension being the contract term for the previous period is set to expire <br />before Council can take further action. The motion was seconded by Councilman <br />Kearney and passed unanimously. Councilman Gareau moved for adoption. The motion <br />was seconded by Councilman Kearney and passed unanimously. Resolution No. 2009-71 <br />adopted. <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.