Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />(2) Maintain engineering documentation required in section 1361.04(a)(4) that the <br />flood carrying capacity of the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse <br />will not be diminished. <br />(3) Require that necessary maintenance will be provided for the altered or relocated <br />portion of said watercourse so that the flood carrying capacity will not be <br />diminished. <br />( fl Interpretation of Flood Boundaries. Make interpretations, where needed, as to the <br />exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there <br />appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions). Where a map <br />boundary and elevations disagree, the elevations delineated in the flood elevation profile shall <br />prevail. The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable <br />opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Section 1361.06. <br />1361.06 VARIANCE PROCEDURE <br />(a) Ai Board. The Board of Building Code Appeals as established by the City shall <br />hear and decide appeals and requests for variances from the requirements of this chapter. <br />The Board of Building Code Appeals shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged <br />there is an enor in any requirement, decision or determination made by the Building <br />Commissioner in the enforcement or administration of this chapter. <br />Those aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Building Code Appeals, or any taxpayer, <br />may appeal such decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, as provided in <br />Ohio R.C. Chapter 2506. <br />In passing upon such applications, the Board of Building Code Appeals shall consider all <br />technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this chapter <br />and: <br />(1) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; <br />(2) The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; <br />(3) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and <br />the effect of such damage on the individual owner; <br />(4) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the <br />community; <br />(5) The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not <br />subject to flooding or erosion damage; <br />(6) The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; <br />(7) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; <br />9