63-224 Ordinance - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE No. 63 - ~ /_ ! AN ORDINANCE RI~QUIRING A RBFERENCE BY THB BUILDING COMMISSIONER OP AN APPLICATION FOR A H~JILDIIWG PER- '~~ A+tIT iN CURTAIN CASES TO THS BG?ARD OF &JILDING CODS APPEALS , AND DBCLAR I NG AN BMSRGE~iC'Y. BE IT ORDAIAtED by the Council of the City of North Olmsted, State of Qhios Section 1: That when the Huilding Administrator re- ceives an application fora permit to construct, alter or add to any ~structtsre 4r to move any already existing structure from one site to another and he finds that the structure prop©sed to be constructed, altered, added to or moved to s new site would be of such design, material or 1c~caton ss to substantially impair the waiue of neighboring pr©pert3.ea, fail to conform to the erstabiished pattern of development of the area or be Cketrimer-tal to the general welfare and future gr~rth of the cety, he shad, within ten (l~) days of rtEeipt of such application refer the same to the Bawd of Building Code Appeals for a decision as t o whether or not such permit sha31 be issued. Section ~~ That the Hoard of Building Code Appealffi shall, within thirty (30) days after the reference of arch application, hold a public meeting thereon, of which hearing at least ten (10) days notice shall be given by pubiiaateon in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality. The Board of Building Cade Appeals shall, not later than fifteen C15) days after such public hearing, determent whether the permit so applied for shall be issued or rejected. Wretten notice of the determination by the Board of Building Code Appeals shall be given by first class mail to the applic- ant by the Building Administrator within five (~) days following the decision of the Board. Section 3t That the Hoard, en deciding whether or not a permit a~hali be issued in such cases, shall consider: (a) Whether or not the structure proposed to be constructed, altered, added to or moved from another site is of such design, material or location as to substantially impair the value of neighboring properness; and (b) Whether or not such structure conforms to the already estableshed pattern of development in the area; and (c) Whether or not it is detrimental to the general welfare and future growth of the city, and (d) Whether the rejection of the application for a permit would unreasonably empede the ntarmal development of the property for which the per- n~it is sought.