|
2 _
<br /> ; - ,
<br />' ould stand to lose millions od dollara inrevenue by not having direet
<br />? access to`this road.
<br /> Thie road being cons*ructed practically through the'center aP our
<br /> ity, prevents having a firedepartment or a police department located
<br /> n:any central poaition so that it would:make it accessible to all parts.
<br /> f its C1ty,;beo8use of the:inaccesaibility to:join its many etreeLa that
<br /> ill run North and South from this-road-to other outlets, whicYi migYit
<br /> , . .
<br />??
<br />-
<br />:-
<br /> ....__.__-____?
<br />-
<br />---------
<br />-
<br />-----
<br /> In-other-words, this=highway-becomes-a-detrimen ?*; ins*ead-:of-a ?
<br />`- roPitable-asset, : to-the- genL,,ral-public-and-taxpayer-of---the-city-of-North
<br />. _ ,
<br />-- ,lmated-and-the_-city-_of-P_arkview.?__.,--?-__
<br />=- , The-landowner_s_wo uld_xeadily: wi_thdraw any-damage suits,-if-2the^,State?
<br /> ighway__Department._would___grant all_concerned,_the aecessibility, to_this
<br />_:..._ ..ighw&Y• . .
<br />
<br /> Therefore, we, the taxpayera and landowners, ask;the city?oP North
<br />? ,lmsted Council, and its Mayor, to repeal any sight-oi'-way agreement
<br />
<br />-- -- .... aiaav v v... zrv aa.abaa? ow .+vNua vuavaa v! .aaa..v vaav r. v uv+ ? .. ....?.. .. ?
<br />We'do not believe, tha* *he.Council or i*s Mayor`knew exactly what
<br />__...?_ . .,?..._?._..__._. ...??.,?.__
<br />he 8tar,e Highway.Department proposed to them when they voted this high-
<br />4Y grant to the 3tate of Ohio. We believe, thax the 3ta*e HighwAy.
<br />, . _
<br />-----_----____-
<br />epartment should meet with a committee representing the landowners and
<br />..
<br />he lawyers and solici+ors, representing s city and Lhe.city oT .
<br />?
<br />'arkview; andTrevise-thi-s-etructure-sa-*hat--everyone-wouid-be-trsated
<br />- :
<br />?quil1Y-1n-this-matter.
<br />; - -
<br />ttte_know,Tthere_is-now-betng-proposed-by--the-council-and-busine ss
<br />4P
<br />resen_ta*iv_es.?of-tne city_of?.North_Olmated,.a?p?oposal.,vto zone ntage along_this new Roure 1'j, for *he_ purpose of light,industry and ?
<br />?ro
<br />1,----__._.__ ultiple dwellings and busineas seetion.
<br />This proposed.zoning ordinance would:naur, and under the pregent
<br />.------------
<br />2 ircumstances, be a waste of 'time and energy,- because St destroys all
<br />_ ?__.......
<br />f"'Lhe acces$ibil3ty to it. This is another reason why the landownera, t
<br />$x'payers and residents of botn North Olmsted and Parkview, ehould by -
<br />I means, objectto: thie unreasonable, inaccessible . pmject. ?
<br />_... ?.?. _.___....
<br />Ths road, a8 we understand, will`have to be maintained and L?he:traffi
<br />lights on the intersections .will also?have to be mainaineCbY:the
<br />;
<br />^ities`and?Lhe villagesor *ownships, tha* _ft paeses through;?thls 1s ?
<br />.
<br />.
<br />,, -
<br />. .
|