My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-058 Ordinance
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2017
>
2017-058 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 2:13:02 PM
Creation date
9/6/2017 2:02:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2017-058
Legislation Date
9/5/2017
Year
2017
Legislation Title
Traffic Signalization Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As above, ODOT and other agencies may be contacted. <br />C. Firm's Current Workload/ Availability of Personnel (Considered at statewide meeting) <br />In instances when consultant's current workload may impact their ability to complete the <br />work as proposed, the firm's current workload and availability of qualified personnel shall <br />be considered. <br />d. Consultant's Past Performance <br />The consultants' past performance on similar projects, including subconsultant <br />performance, shall be ranked and scored on a relative, differential scoring type basis, with <br />the highest ranked consultant receiving a commensurately greater number of points. The <br />selection team should consider ODOT CES performance ratings if available, and consult <br />other ODOT Districts, ODOT Central Offices, and other agencies as appropriate. The use of <br />CES ratings shall place emphasis on the specific type of services requested. <br />The differential scoring should consider the complexity of the project and any subfactors <br />identified in the project notification. <br />e. Project Approach <br />Evaluation of the firm's project approach shall consider: <br />(1) The firm's technical approach and understanding of the project. <br />(2) The firm's qualifications for the project including knowledge and experience concerning <br />relevant ODOT standards, procedures and guidance documents. <br />(3) Any innovative ideas. <br />When considering this factor in rating firms, the type of project and the relevance of this factor <br />to the project must be considered. For task order and construction inspection projects, and <br />small uncomplicated design projects, the possibility for innovation may be very limited. Larger <br />more complex projects will generally offer more opportunities for innovation. Consultants <br />that identify truly innovative ideas should receive credit in the selection rating, but this factor <br />can be disregarded when projects offer little opportunity for innovation. <br />(4) The firm's project specific plan for ensuring increased quality, reduced project delivery <br />time and reduced project costs. <br />These factors will be relatively more important and relevant to a complex PDP project, <br />and much less important for a construction inspection or task order contract. Please <br />remember that Federal rules prohibit consideration of overhead rates, wage rates or any <br />other cost data submitted voluntarily by the consultant. <br />D. Negotiation of Consultant Agreements <br />Agreements shall be negotiated in accordance with ODOT's Manual for Administration of Contracts for <br />Professional Services, Volume 1 Consultant Contract Administration, Section 3.9. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.