My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/2019 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
5/21/2019 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2019 12:48:03 PM
Creation date
6/20/2019 3:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
5/21/2019
Year
2019
Legislation Title
05-21-19 Council Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 5-21-2019 <br />and references. She said it is more complicated. Relative to Westlake, the City just does <br />not know if they will or won't. The City is hopeful residents would not be paying any <br />kind of surcharges, transfer charges, delivery charges, connection charges, but there is no <br />guarantee of that. She asked what Mr. Brake would ask her to tell him if any of that <br />happened. <br />Mr. Brake said I'm simply trying to make the connection between the issue before <br />Council tonight and the uncertainty of the litigation in Westlake. <br />Council President Jones said she might be able to help clear it up. She said the concern <br />she thinks the Councilwoman is trying to express is if the City of North Olmsted hands <br />the assets over to Cleveland Water and if the determination of the Westlake litigation <br />says communities can choose to receive water from another entity other than Cleveland <br />Water, the City's assets are now in the hands of Cleveland and not in North Olmsted. <br />Mr. Brake asked how that would be different from today. He said the whole idea of this <br />proposal is the City assets are in the hands of Cleveland Water. <br />Council President Jones said the City would no longer own its assets if the City wanted to <br />move to another water provider. <br />Mr. Brake said ok, but it is his understanding that's not a practical alternative anyway as <br />these are not assets that the City can just pick up and move. He said it's not the same as a <br />mobile home or something like that. <br />Aaron Campbell <br />6316 Brighton Drive <br />Mr. Campbell said the point he took from all of this is whether the City gets in this <br />agreement or not and regardless of the outcome of the litigation, it is the same result for <br />North Olmsted. Regardless if the City is in the MUD or out of it, whatever the outcome <br />of the litigation if they raise prices and charge a transfer fee, residents still pay it because <br />there is no other alternative for the water. That is why he supports this agreement, <br />because there is access to funds to support the City's infrastructure with no cost to the <br />community. He said in his opinion by not supporting this the City is just passing on the <br />funds for no reason. <br />LEGISLATION <br />Resolution 2018-90 introduced by Mayor Kennedy was given its third reading. A <br />Resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into agreements with the City of Cleveland, <br />Division of Water to establish a Municipal Utilities District, to restate the Water Services <br />Agreement, and to provide for the transfer of water utility assets from the City of North <br />Olmsted. Councilwoman Hemann moved for adoption. The motion was seconded by <br />Councilman Glassburn and failed 6-1. <br />Roll Call: <br />Yes: Schumann <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.