My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-069 Resolution
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2024
>
2024-069 Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 10:01:14 AM
Creation date
7/9/2024 9:57:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2024-069
Legislation Date
6/27/2024
Year
2024
Legislation Title
FOP CBA 01-01-24 through 12-31-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The parties deleted the existing HSA/HDHP Funding language and instead added: as part of its plan <br />offerings, the City may include HSA or HRAs, which include a city -provided funding level. The parties <br />agree that for the years 2024-2026, the HSA funding level will not be less than 50% of the annual deductible <br />of the individual and family coverage, and that if a HRA is established it will be supplemental to the HSA <br />offering during the term of the Agreement. Prior to establishing an HRA funding structure, the parties will <br />meet and discuss the effects. <br />Under the dental/vision section, the employees will participate in the current AFSCME benefit plan as long <br />as it is available. Should availability change, the parties will meet to identify and select a comparable <br />provider. <br />Article 15, Clothing Allowance <br />In Section 6, the parties agreed that the Employer shall pay for all employees' body armor, a minimum <br />threat level NUHG 2. The parties also agreed to increase the body armor allowance from $1,200 to $1,600. <br />Article 16, Sick Leave/Lniury Leave <br />The parties agreed to add the reasons for which sick leave may be utilized to the contract, identifying the <br />same reasons as those that were added to the AFSCME agreements. In Section 9, the parties added Fitness <br />for Duty Examinations/Disability Separation language to explain the process for both. <br />In Section 10, the parties added language stating that if an officer is shot, the initial authorization will be <br />up to one hundred eighty (180) days sicklinjury leave. To be eligible for such leave, the employee most <br />complete any required documentation for the incident, apply to the TPA for medical benefits only, and be <br />certified by a city -approved provider as having a qualified line of duty injury. <br />In Section 11, the parties created a section for non -emergency response injuries. Under this section, if an <br />employee does not quality for any of the benefits in this article but has sustained a line of duty injury and <br />used his own sick leave during the FML period may opt to turn over BWC funds. Any amount turned over <br />to the Employer shall be credited to the employee's sick leave bank on a dollar -for -dollar basis. <br />Article 17, Bereavement Leave <br />In Section 1, the parties agreed to change the amount of bereavement leave offered. Now, employees shall <br />receive up to forty (40) work hours of paid bereavement leave which must be taken in conjunction with the <br />date(s) of dmth/funeral/service, in the event of the death of an immediate family member. The paries also <br />added a sentence that documentation may be required to substantiate the requested leave. <br />Article 18, Grievance Procedure <br />The parties agreed to delete the sentence that unanswered grievances by the Employer shall be considered <br />to have been appealed to the next step. <br />The parties added a paragraph under Section 3 which states for purposes of calculating time limits, calendar <br />days shall be limited to business days when the administrative offices are open, excluding all weekends and <br />holidays. If the deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, the deadline shall be considered the next regular <br />business day. <br />Under Section 6, the parties revised the language addressing the selection of arbitrators to include the ability <br />to mutually agree to use any arbitrator to hear the case, and a new subsection explaining the selection <br />4 <br />488]-]988-7813, v. 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.