My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/2024 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
09/17/2024 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 2:17:51 PM
Creation date
10/2/2024 2:14:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/17/2024
Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
James A & Florence J Burns <br />3978 Dover Center Rd <br />North Olmsted, OH 44070-1704 <br />To: Council, Mayor, Economic Development Director <br />From: Jim Burns (Personal) <br />Re: Ordinance 2024-62 - Planned Development Zoning District <br />I attended the September 30, 2024 Council committee meeting. I noted a couple of arguments for the <br />proposal that I feel need commenting on. <br />The Director of Economic Development stated that the proposed Planned Development Zoning District <br />would make the process of approval more efficient. He gave an example of a development of 37 <br />residential lots that had a total of 75 zoning code variances. He said that they would not have to go <br />through the Board of Zoning Appeals; therefore, allowing these variances to be automatically approved. <br />Efficiencies would be realized because Zoning Code variances would be automatically approved. I <br />believe that the Board of Zoning Appeals should be the body that evaluates whether a variance <br />approvel is granted instead of the variance being automatically allowed. With this proposal Council may <br />not even be made aware of the variances being automatically approved. <br />The Director mentioned a development that took a year to be approved. He said the zoning variance <br />requests made the approval process take two months longer than it should have. It should have taken <br />ten monhts not a yearr. First, we don't know if this development was picked to make a point or if it is <br />representative for most developments that are approved. All developers know that when zoning <br />variances are required it is going to take longer for approval. This is not bad as it may cause the <br />developer to rethink what variances he wants to put in the plans. Second, it is more important that <br />developments meet standards that have been put in place to protect the health and welfare of our <br />residents. For example, individual residences could be built right next to each other like row houses <br />without zoning variances being required. Remember, zoning requirements such as setbacks, side yard <br />distances and fencing are the result of input from the Building Department, Fire Department and Police <br />Department. <br />The Director mentiond that this proposal was the result of interviews of various people. We do not <br />know who these people are. They may all be developers who have a vested interest in changing our <br />laws to benefit their development in terms of timing and cost. <br />One Councilman mentioned that he has heard that developers do not want to build in North Olmsted <br />because of our approval process. I have heard this said about many cities. Cities have codes in place to <br />protect residents and assure safe and compatable development. you should be more concerned about <br />your residents and city visitors than the developers. Don't thow your Zoning Code out because a <br />developer wants to reduce his cost and increase his revenue. <br />Jim Burns <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.