My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/24/2026 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2026
>
2/24/2026 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 1:42:45 PM
Creation date
3/4/2026 1:37:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
2/24/2026
Year
2026
Legislation Title
Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that. He drove down Butternut Ridge, and he saw all the preserve the Historic District signs. But, <br />and again, I'm just paraphrasing was that these really don't, public opinion really doesn't matter. <br />It matters what's in the written documents, if I'm correct on this, what was said and the 2025 <br />master plan. But input from the residents was used to form the master plan. So it does matter. <br />The public opinion was strongly shown in these documents that they want this Historic District <br />preserved. It's been chipped away at enough over the years. We've lost a lot on Butternut. It's <br />been a struggle. But I hope that the analysis that's been submitted of these two documents <br />should put this over the top for you making your decision to deny this request because it's <br />saturated with information on why you should deny it. Thank you very much. <br />John Adamczyk: <br />My name is John Adamczyk, 6014 Sand Piper Lane. Last time I asked a simple question, and I have <br />yet to hear an answer. And the question is this... someone counseled who at some point in time <br />thought it was important to establish a Historic District, and that's lasted [inaudible]. And now <br />there seems to be a moment to change. I know you're not going to answer that question as to <br />why, but may I suggest something? At some point in time, whatever the outcome, why don't you <br />consider writing a letter to Westlife explaining why the change or why the need to stop <br />maintaining the district? Inform the residents of North Olmsted about your decision. That would <br />go a long way to establish the credibility of the [inaudible]. Thank you. <br />Councilman Limpert: <br />Mr. President. <br />President Pro Tern Scarl: <br />Mr. Limpert. <br />Councilman Limpert: <br />You asked the question, sir. I'm not aware of any Council Member who said they want to abandon <br />the Historic District. I mean, unless you have heard something different? I've been in meetings. <br />I've been in these sessions. I haven't heard any Council Person say they want to get rid of the <br />Historic District in any of these sessions. Yea, that's factually... <br />John Adamczyk: <br />Do you think that putting a multi -family homes will destroy the Historic District? <br />President Pro Tern Scarl: <br />Sir, we're not going to discuss that. <br />Councilman Limpert: <br />No, but I will comment. I don't think any of us has said that we want to. I don't think any of us <br />has made the proposal to do so. This is the first time that this is before this Council in the public <br />hearing. <br />John Adamczyk: <br />I've been here once before, this is not the first time. <br />02-24-26 Public Nearing Minutes - Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.