Laserfiche WebLink
new work shall be differentiated fi-om the old and shall be compatible <br />with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the <br />historic integrity of the property and its environment. <br />(10)New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be <br />undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential <br />form and environment would be unimpaired. <br />(e) In the case of archeological properties, the Architectural Board of <br />Review shall refer to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's <br />Treatment of Archeological Properties: A Handbook or successor pub - <br />lication(s). <br />(d) Approval Not Self- executing Where the Commission has Issued <br />Unique Historic Guidelines: When Unique Historic Guidelines have <br />been established, if the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration <br />or demolition is determined to have no adverse effect on the HPD or <br />the HP, and does not violate the spirit and propose of these preservation <br />regulations, then the Architectural Board of Review shall approve the <br />Certificate of Appropriateness, subject to a final additional review by <br />the Commission. <br />(e) Denial: If the Architectural Board of Review determines that the <br />proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration or demolition will <br />have an adverse effect on the HPD or HP and does violate the spirit and <br />purpose of these preservation regulations, then the Architectural Re- <br />view Board shalt deny the Certificate of Appropriateness. <br />(f) Notice of Denial to Applicant: In the event that the Architectural <br />Board of Review denies an application for a Certificate of Appropriate- <br />ness, the Secretary of the Architectural Board of Review shall forthwith <br />notify the applicant of such determination in writing and transmit to <br />him/her a copy of the reasons for denial and recommendations, if any, <br />of the Architectural Board of Review. <br />(g) Effect of Denial: Upon denying an application for a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness, the Architectural Board of Review shall impose a <br />waiting period to not exceed thirty (30) days from the date of disap- <br />proval during which the applicant may develop a compromise proposal. <br />With respect to an application involving a demolition, the Architectural <br />Board of Review may, at its discretion, extend the aforementioned <br />waiting period a maximum of one (1) year from the date of disapproval. <br />If both parties accept a compromise proposal, the Architectural Board <br />of Review may henceforth approve a final Certificate of Appropriate- <br />ness, unless Unique Historic Guidelines have been adopted by the <br />Commission and pertain, in which case any compromise must also be <br />approved by the Commission. <br />(h) Negotiations During Waiting Period for Demolition: In the case of <br />a denial of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for demo- <br />lition: <br />(1) The Architectural Board of Review, along with the Director, <br />Commissioner, members of the Heritage Advisory Board, and other of- <br />ficials of the City as needed, may participate in negotiations with the <br />owner or owners and any other interested party in an effort to find a <br />