Laserfiche WebLink
3. 503.02 LICENSE APPLICATION, FEE AND REQUIREMENTS; ISSUANCE AND <br />APPEAL; DVERTISING. <br />(j) A facility shall comply with applicable State and local laws and regulations. <br />Comment: Sections (j)1-7 delineate the process for the issuance and revocation of a license to <br />operate a freestanding surgical outpatient facility and the appeal mechanisms if a license is not <br />issued or if a license is revoked. The rules look to fulfill procedural due process requirements. <br />Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976)(“\[A\]llthat is necessary is that the procedures be <br />tailored, in light of the decision to be made, to the capacities and circumstances of those who are <br />to be heard, to insure that they are given a meaningful opportunity to present their case.” 424 <br />U.S., at 349 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)). <br />(o) The use of the word "approved" or similar words by a facility is prohibited. The word <br />"licensed" may be used by a licensed facility. <br />(p) The use of the word “hospital” or words having similar meaning is prohibited in <br />reference to a facility except to identify a facility owned and operated by a licensed <br />hospital by including, if desired, the name of the parent hospital in the name or by a <br />modifying phrase or a clause as a subtitle of the facility's name. <br />(q) The use of the word "safe" or words of similar meaning to describe any services <br />rendered by a freestanding surgical outpatient facility is prohibited in the absence of <br />information about the risks associated with the procedure. <br />Comment: There is no First Amendment bar to an ordinance that, as here, limits commercial <br />expressions that may be misleading or connote government approval or sponsorship. Virginia <br />State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Commercial Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976)(The <br />government may prohibit false, misleading or deceptive speech). <br />The term “licensed” accurately describes the legal status of a freestanding surgical outpatient <br />facility, whereas the term “approved” connotes governmental sponsorship of the particular <br />services being offered. Because the government has a constitutional interest in preferring <br />childbirth over abortion, Casey, 505 U.S., at 872, the term “approved” may mislead potential <br />consumers of the government’s position. <br />The term “surgical outpatient facility” as used inthis ordinance is equivalent to “ambulatory <br />surgical facility.” Both terms have been used by various states and municipalities. See, e.g. <br />Michigan Compiled Laws, Ch. 333 Health; Hawaii, Title 11, Ch. 95 Freestanding outpatient <br />surgical facilities; Helen W. Wu, Emerald Montgomery, Kenneth Kizer, “A Review of <br />Regulatory Standards, Quality of Care Concerns, and Oversight of Ambulatory Surgery Clinics, <br />Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities, and End-Stage Renal Disease Facilities,” <br />California Department of Public Health, June 2017. <br />3 <br /> <br />