MIN 04-19-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Discussion: Mayor George expressed concerns about parklets and felt they deserve a broader Council discussion. She cited issues that the safety forces noted and added the Planning Commission's deferred parklet discussions, along with changes to the last parklet location. She lastly stated a desire to be on record for advocating that parklets not be included in the outdoor dining resolution. President O'Malley made a motion, seconded by Vice President Litten to exclude parklets from Resolution 2020-31B. Discussion: Councilmember Bullock cited the committee discussion with the mayor and its recommendation. He added he would have supported the current language without amendment and stated his belief that the current process is working well. President O'Malley asked when the current parklet resolution expires. Mayor George indicated that the expanded outdoor dining resolution was designed to continue past when the governor lis the state emergency order. She added the topic is worthy ofa longer discussion, citing private vs.public space use,public safety concerns, and past traffic accidents regarding sight lines. Councilmember Rader stated that Council should start discussion on a permanent ordinance and that current course should be maintained with the pilot. He noted he would support the motion if the mayor is supportive ofa permanent conversation. Chief Dunphy stated the administration is not against parklets as a concept. The opposition to including them in this resolution is based on the safety and security ofpeople enjoying them. He added that the biggest concern is a potential risk to residents, noting a desire to continue conversation and applauding the Planning Departments efforts thus far. Councilmember Bullock reiterated the committee deliberation and cited a business'pending application before the Planning Commission. He also argued for the merits ofparklets. Councilmember Shachner stated he did not believe the mayor's request is unreasonable, adding that he just disagreed with how to proceed. He added that the current process is working. Councilmember Kepple echoed Councilmember Shachner's sentiments and added change would cause upheaval for the restaurant industry. She cited the Planning Department's efforts to help folks and advocated for keeping the status quo while keeping permanent parklet conversation ongoing. President O'Malley indicated that he was contemplating withdrawing the motion. Director Leininger advocated for not including parklets in the extension and allowing them to continue through the public health emergency while a larger conversation was ongoing.