My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
minpw 11-08-21
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Committee Minutes
>
2021
>
Public Works
>
minpw 11-08-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2021 11:36:04 AM
Creation date
12/1/2021 11:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Public Works
Date
11/8/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Baas discussed the rationale for charging a fee. He explained that government has stepped in <br /> to provide this service as a public good due to a lack of action in the private market. However, <br /> long-term, the city aims to incentivize the private market to install chargers as part of new <br /> commercial and residential developments and to incentivize residents to do the same at their <br /> homes. If the city continues to provide this service free of charge, it risks becoming the sole <br /> provider and distorting the marketplace by disincentivizing it from investing in private <br /> infrastructure. <br /> Mr. Baas discussed the need to consider replacement costs of the current chargers. The current <br /> chargers have an estimated lifespan of ten years. It is not anticipated that grant funds will be <br /> available replace chargers. <br /> Mr. Baas shared information that he gathered on nearby EV chargers and their rates. Rates are <br /> charged per kilowatt hour. Shaker Heights recently debated adding an EV rate and decided to <br /> charge $0.20/kWh. <br /> Mr. Baas explained the various components of a fair rate for use of an EV charger, which <br /> includes the cost of electricity, the cost of future replacement of the equipment and the cost of <br /> idling time. The idling time cost would be similar to the existing parking code and would be <br /> necessary to ensure fair access to the charger. Two dollars per hour is currently being considered. <br /> Regarding the cost of future replacement, Mr. Baas recommended that the equipment be replaced <br /> after 10 years and that an extended warranty be purchased after 5 years. <br /> Councilmember Rader contemplated that new signage would be needed to ensure that drivers <br /> were fully aware of the penalties of parking in these spots without charging. <br /> Councilmember Bullock advocated for rates that are competitive and fair to users with the caveat <br /> that penalties could be sharper for misuse of the charging spots. <br /> Councilmember Shachner asked the department to look into the infrastructure bill that recently <br /> passed, which contains some EV charging money. <br /> Councilmember Rader asked for information at the next meeting about how charging may affect <br /> usage. He expressed overall support for charging as part of a sustainable model. He committed to <br /> scheduling a follow up meeting on the topic. <br /> Public Works and Sustainability Committee adjourned at 7:04 <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.