minps 11-07-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

provide long-term insight by collecting huge data sets over long periods of time. These data sets can be broken down into 15 minute intervals, which helps enforcement get to the right locations at the right times, as each street has its own distinctive patterns. Police Chief Kaucheck reviewed speed enforcement trends over the last several years, noting that citation dips during COVID years were anomalies. He also stated that the department encountered staffing challenges in 2020 due to many unexpected retirements. This prompted the department to stick to its core services, focusing on crimes, calls for emergency, and traffic accidents. Spending time on these types of calls takes away from the department's capacity for radar enforcement, however every school zone has an officer assigned during arrival and dismissal time, depending on call volume. The city has built in capacity for 5 more officers, which should allow extra officers to run radar. The neighborhood officers meet weekly with the Planning Department to review speed data. Police also keep a list of areas from citizen and Council complaints. Law Director Vargo reviewed the key factors to consider for the implementation of stationary speed cameras. State law provides burdens to their use, such as safety studies of incidents over the previous 3 years and public information campaigns, however they are not insurmountable. Each camera would require the presence of law enforcement in order to issue civil fines. The receipt of state funds by the city is reduced if fines are issued outside of school zones. Chair Baker stated he is agnostic on speed cameras, and proposed considering their implementation in school zones. Lakewood receives $2.3 million in funds from the state. Councilmember Shachner asked whether Planning has seen a majority of high-speed events occurring throughout the city or whether it can be broken down into quadrants. Mr. Baas stated that the city does not have the data to support either conclusion, and that Lakewood is hyper local when it comes to speeding events. Mr. Shachner continued to ask whether staff could determine factors that precipitate high-speed events. Mr. Baas indicated that factors could be correlation and that speed studies are often restricted to smaller corridors to reduce the amount of variables. He drew examples from a speed study he conducted on Franklin Blvd. which was very labor intensive and difficult from which to draw conclusions, as the further the geographic scope expands, the more speculation increases. Councilmembers then asked Director Vargo various questions regarding the details of the safety study required by state law in order to implement traffic cameras. The state statute lacks clarity, so further legal research will be required. Councilmembers noted the use of cameras in school zones in other Northeast Ohio suburbs such as Parma and Newburgh Heights. Planning staff then provided a variety of updates on specific street-level traffic calming reviews currently underway. Chief Kaucheck informed the committee of the variety of ways officers can enforce speed limits, with radar being their biggest tool.