Laserfiche WebLink
would be necessary for a study. Chair Baker supported more data gathering while stepping up <br /> speed enforcement. <br /> Chief Kaucheck shared the police perspective, noting that the afternoons and mornings are the <br /> busiest speeding times. The Division of Police started a preliminary overtime detail over the last <br /> couple of months that goes out 3 times per week to run radar in school zones. In 12 shifts, LPD <br /> officers issued 26 speeding violations and the effort has been productive so far. He noted that <br /> 251 radar citations were issued in 2019, lower numbers in the COVID years of 2020 & 2021, and <br /> 324 in 2022. LPD has issued 59 speed citations through January 16'', 2023, which will put the <br /> department on pace for several hundred by year's end. Discussion ensued on the sustainability of <br /> the overtime speed detail. Chief Kaucheck indicated that regular duty shift overtime coverage is <br /> dropping and that he will continue to monitor the budget throughout the year. He will provide the <br /> cost of the speed detail overtime shifts at the behest of councilmembers. <br /> It was noted that LPD officers run radar throughout their shifts if they are not working a call. <br /> Chair Baker summarized the data and information provided by Mr. Baas and Chief Kaucheck <br /> and asked what the next steps might be for assisting law enforcement with speeding camera <br /> technology in school zones. Director Vargo stated that a 3-year study is the first step towards <br /> their installation, and that data from the city's traffic calming program could count towards that <br /> requirement. He noted that vendors for speeding cameras typically take 30% of the revenue <br /> collected. He added that there are signage requirements, the duty to provide "extreme notice"to <br /> drivers, an initial grace period once cameras are set up, and the need for an officer to be present <br /> onsite to witness speeders as cameras operate in school zones. All citations issued would be civil <br /> in nature and the city has to pre-pay court costs for any citation issued. The revenue from the <br /> cameras is strictly dependent on the driver to pay. The cost to the city would entail vendor and <br /> court costs,with city prosecutors handling and processing the citations. Lakewood Municipal <br /> Court would need to be comfortable with the evidentiary value of cameras. Mr. Vargo noted that <br /> these are all manageable issues that an orchestrated process can take care of, concluding that he <br /> will have an itemized list upon further meetings. <br /> Chair Baker expressed interest in getting more data from school zones. He stated that this would <br /> be a serious change for residents and non-residents, and that the data needs to lead the city to the <br /> result. He cited examples in Mayfield and Cleveland Heights where speed limits were being <br /> reduced, inquiring if the city has looked at their methods. Director Vargo indicated that the Law <br /> Department is reviewing the changes adopted by Cleveland Heights and that 3-4 weeks of <br /> significant analysis will be needed to advise on next steps and examine whether their method of <br /> redesignating streets could be adopted. <br /> Councilmember Bullock spoke about speed being a chronic issue in Lakewood and shared his <br /> unfruitful interactions with ODOT in regard to getting speed limits lowered. <br />