Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE <br />JUNE 12, 2023 <br />AUDITORIUM <br /> <br />Present: Councilmembers Rader (Chair), Bullock, Baker <br /> <br />Also: City Engineer Papke, Law Director Vargo, Council staff <br /> <br />Call to Order: 7:01 p.m. <br /> <br />Approval of the minutes of the May 22, 2023 meeting of the Public Works & Sustainability <br />Committee. <br /> <br />nd <br />Without objection from the committee, Chairman Rader approved the minutes of the May 22 meeting of the <br />Public Works & Sustainability Committee. <br />RESOLUTION 2023-32 –A RESOLUTION to take effect immediately provided it receives the <br />affirmative vote of at least five members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after <br />the earliest period allowed by law, authorizing the City Engineer of the City of Lakewood to prepare <br />and execute an application for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds for the stated <br />described project and to submit same to the Northeast Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) <br />for consideration of funding by Ohio Association of Regional Councils (OARC) on behalf of <br />Lakewood. (Referred to PWS 6/5/23) <br />City Engineer Papke spoke about the requirements for CMAQ funding, pinpointing 5 intersections in Lakewood <br />that are eligible. Through NOACA, preliminary plans for funding were submitted after traffic studies were <br />applied. Mr. Papke described safety as a priority for the improvement of the intersections. He explained that the <br />th <br />resolution is required by the end of the month, being reason for the request for approval at the June 20General <br />Meeting. The minimum City contribution for funds is 20%, but the City can score higher by contributing more. <br />Chair Rader asked about the competitiveness of the grant. Mr. Papke explained that the City of Lakewood will <br />be competing with other cities and their projects. If Lakewood does not receive funding, there are plans <br />prepared for two signals on Detroit Ave. There has already been some budget set aside for theproject. <br />Councilmember Bullock expressed his concern about the City’s potential contribution of 40% within the <br />legislation. Mr. Papke described the importance of a higher contribution for a higher chance of receiving <br />funding and moving the project forward. Councilmember Bullock and Mr. Papke went over other advancements <br />of infrastructure that could be applicable to the city. <br />Councilmember Baker asked about the advancement of leading walk signals for pedestrians. Mr. Papke spoke <br />about the study that can occur once funds are awarded as part of the Traffic Engineering and Planning <br />Development. Leading pedestrian intervals were described as unsafe in busy intersections but helpful in areas <br />without a left turn lane. Two intersections were mentioned as potential areas for improvement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Baker and Mr. Papke went over the project plan development criteria with ODOT. ADA curve <br />ramps were mentioned as part of the compliant code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Baker and Mr. Papke spoke about the update of signals at the corner of each elementary school. <br />Mr. Papke described the work being done on the programs regarding safe routes to school. There are studies in <br />the works that can potentially make those areas eligible for funding. <br /> <br /> <br />