Laserfiche WebLink
several programs that look at the ramps and crossways. He said this year they set aside funding <br />to improve over 90 accessible ramps in the community. He also provided other examples of how <br />the City has leveraged general projects to improve overall accessibility. <br />In response to questions from Councilmember Bullock, Director Leininger explained that today’s <br />plan only deals with the public realm. He stated there is a whole other realm that deals with <br />regulations for private entities, and the City may get involved with that via permitting and <br />building regulations. He shared that they have had internal conversations about how the City <br />might utilize their store front dollars to encourage local business to invest in accessibility <br />measures. <br />Steve Metzer then went on to address questions asked by Councilmember Bullock regarding the <br />prioritization of the plan recommendations. He explained that each recommendation is classified <br />as low, medium, or high priority according to a number of factors. He said one of the biggest <br />factors that comes to play for the buildings and parks is which ones are the highest use facilities. <br />He also explained another major factor is how big of a barrier an item presents for an individual <br />with a disability. Smaller barriers like a light switch being an inch too high can be addressed as <br />building improvements are made, whereas a barrier like a bathroom door not being wide enough <br />to accommodate a wheelchair would be a high priority. <br />Councilmember Rader asked how the plan will be reflected in the budget and how progress will <br />be communicated to Council. Director Leininger replied that because this is part of an overall <br />community improvement plan, a lot of the progress will be part of how the City does business <br />going forward. He stated when the City starts a new project (road, facility, park, etc.) <br />accessibility improvements will be incorporated into the overall planning process, however there <br />may be some individual line items that are ADA specific. He also shared that Michelle Nochta <br />serves as the ADA Coordinator and at the end of each year she will summarize and report <br />progress made towards the plan. <br />Councilmember Baker asked about staff training and how the City plans to address the culture <br />side of implementation. Director Leininger replied that as part of the process the consultants <br />provided a series of staff training courses on various accessibility topics. He also said that ADA <br />modules have been added to the NEO.gov training system through Human Resources. He said <br />moving forward they will incorporate additional training opportunities like site visits and walk <br />throughs so that staff can think about this issue from a 360-degree perspective. <br />Chairman Litten invited members of the task force to comment on the plan. <br />Tracy Greenberg, 1423 Lauderdale Ave – Ms. Greenberg stated that she is the co-chair of the <br />ADA Transition Plan Task Force and she is very happy about this moment. She shared that a <br />grievance is what they call it when a person with a disability encounters a barrier and they are <br />brave enough to come forward about it. She said that this transition plan eliminates the need for <br />someone to be a “squeaky wheel” and come forwardto improve accessibility. She also stated <br />that since this plan will take at least thirty years to be fully enacted, she thinks we need an <br />ongoing Accessibility Commission to run in tandem with the plan implementation. <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />