Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Rader provided a suggestion for the administration to investigate ways to set up <br />a more robust program for the impermeable surface fees. He then commented that the rate we <br />pay for water from the City of Cleveland seems to be high and he asked how that rate is set and <br />if there is any room for negotiation. Mr. Crea and Mr. McMahon both provided some insight into <br />how that rate is structured and what is included in the purchase price. They confirmed that as of <br />right now Cleveland is the sole-supplier of water for Lakewood, and when controlling for factors <br />unique to Lakewood, our price is comparable to the regional average. Mr. McMahon stated that <br />Lakewood’s system structure is the result of the city having the foresight to build their own water <br />plant 100 years ago. <br />In response to a question from Councilmember Baker, Lou McMahon explained the IWIPP sets <br />out work through 2048, prioritizing projects with the highest return on investment. He said when <br />the city gets to the end of the CSO-059 Storage tank project in about 2033, they will have to <br />submit an update to the plan where they can schedule the reaming measures based on finances <br />and priority. He summarized that this rate proposal reflects five years of funding for a ten-year <br />plan and that there is at least ten more years of work after that. <br />Councilmember Baker then asked for more detail on the plan to replace the water main lines. <br />Mark Pake, City Engineer, responded that the City has approximately 99 miles of water main <br />lines and the typical life is around 100 years. He said they aim to replace about one mile of water <br />main per year. Regarding the lead lines, he said the six-inch cast-iron water lines that were <br />installed in the 1920’s all have lead service connections. As the existing cast-iron water mains <br />are being replaced with new ductile iron pipe, the city is also replacing the lead service lines. He <br />further explained it would not make sense to replace the lead service lines on a one-hundred- <br />year-old cast iron main since it would not withstand the construction. He also said that the city <br />has been taking advantage of EPA funding programs and they do their best to forecast what <br />opportunities might be available as they plan for capital projects. <br />*** <br />Public Works Department Budget Presentation <br />Public Works Director Gordon started his presentation by providing an overview of Lakewood's <br />2023 Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR). Emphasizing the objective of achieving a PCR of 80, <br />he explained that Lakewood is currently on target with a current rating of 80.8. Director Gordon <br />highlighted that the majority of Lakewood's streets are in good to very good condition. He <br />further noted that the costs associated with resurfacing streets, including concrete and curb <br />expenses, have increased. Director Gordon conveyed that to sustain the favorable PCR rating, an <br />annual allocation of $2 million in the capital streets budget is imperative. <br />Director Gordon explained that preparations for the 2024 Crack Sealing Program involve <br />reapplying for the county road preventative maintenance reimbursement program in December <br />2023, with a specific emphasis on prioritizing maintenance activities for Madison, Warren, and <br />Riverside Drive. <br />4 <br /> <br />