My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992 040 Ordinance
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Ordinances Resolutions
>
1992 Ordinances
>
1992 040 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2018 4:02:28 PM
Creation date
8/27/2018 8:29:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Ordinance
Number
040
Date
11/16/1992
Year
1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. ~ -t <br />II <br />DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS <br />This chapter first described Hayfield's development, <br />generally. The type, extent and location of existing land uses <br />in the Study Area are then identified. <br />HAYFIELD: The Village's development between 1970-90 follows.l <br /> ACRES PERCENT <br /> LAND USE 1970 1990 CHANGE 1970 1990 <br /> Residential 420 520 100 26.8 27.5 <br /> Business 60 135 75 3.8 7.1 <br />Industrial 55 160 105 3.5 8.5 <br /> Public 1,030 1,075 45 65.9 56.9 <br /> Total Developed 1,565 1,890 325 100.0 100.0 <br />_ Vacant 955 630 -325 37.9 25.0 <br /> Total Village 2,520 2,520 - 100.0 100.0 <br /> Residential: Land allocated to all residential uses increased <br /> from 26.8$ of all development in 1970, to 27.5$ in 1990; and 100 <br /> acres were developed residentially. Overall density declined <br />- from 2.9 to 2.7 housing units per acre. One family dwellings <br /> occupied 500 acres, or 96.2$ of all 1990 residential land; and <br /> their density was 2.3 units per acre. Multifamily density (13.3 <br /> units per acre) remained virtually the same between 1970-90. <br /> <br />~.! The existing percent of the Village's total developed land <br /> used residentially (27.5) is far below the allocation in other <br />;~ similar suburban communities. Still, its percent of multifamily <br />i <br />i <br /> hous <br />ts and density are comparable. <br />ng un <br /> <br /> Business and Industrial: In Mayfield, these uses rose from 7.3$ <br /> of all development in 1970, to 15.6$ in 1990; and 180 acres were <br />~" developed for such uses. The present allocation (15.6$) is <br /> typical of other suburbs, but the Village's ratio of 7.7 acres <br /> of business and industrial land per 100 residents is larger. <br />Public: Land set aside for public uses in Mayfield dropped from <br />65.9$ of its total development in 1970, to 56.9$ in 1990. This <br />exceptionally high allocation is explained by the North Chagrin <br />- Reservation (590 acres) and I-271's right-of-way (190 acres). <br />Excluding these uses, 295 acres or 15.6$ of all current <br />development is in public use. This allocation2 is actually <br />~- considerably less than in other similar communities. <br />-- Vacant Land: Undeveloped land represented 37.9$ of the <br />Village's total area in 1970, and 25.0$ in 1990. Some 325 acres <br />were developed between 1970-90; and 630 acres remain vacant <br />today. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.