2013 001 Ordinance - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P & Z Minutes Dec 3, 2012 Pg #3 Ted Esborn said if I could add one thing Mr. Chairman. Chuck ICinnaird is here tonight, he owns the parcel that borders the development to the east and to the south. I talked to Chuck last week and this week about some of the concerns he has as a property owner neighboring the development and then conferred with David, John & Debbie. We thought the hest approach would be for him to articulate some of those concerns to this body tonight so that they're memorialized going forward in finalizing the site plan and the Development Agreement. So, if at some point, we could give Mr. Ki.nnaird a few minutes of the floor. Chairman Pro-Tem Regan said o.k., before we do that, John or Tom, do you have anything to add? Mr. Marrelli said the only thing I can think of is if there was some discussion about landscaping along our soccer fields that was going to be done in conjunction with our Landscape Architect. I don't know if that's a detail that comes later or not. That might be part of the Nov I5, 2012 Development Agreement Outline. David Hartt said I thought that was adequately addressed in the Outline. One of the Site Development provisions in the Outline is to include a landscape buffer with tree plantings along the south property line with guidance from Mayfield Village's arborist and landscape architect, which abuts the Village owned property and reasonably placed in accordance with proper landscaping standards. To me, that gives enough latitude whether it's on the subject parcel or somewhere on Village property. Chairman Pro-Tem Regan invites Mr. Kinnaird to speak at this tune. Chuck I{innaird, 294 SOM Center Rd. speaks of his concerns. Mike and I have talked in the past and days before~the meeting we had in the summer here. I'm concerned there's nothing in -•- writing that protects me in the end for what that bier is going to be. We talked•about the Oak Tree which I really want and he's going to do his best to save that. We talked about fencing and mounding. Let me say, there's nothing I can do about this, this is progress, they're entitled to do this and conduct business the way they want to. But, I'd Like to keep their business their business and my business my business. I'm asking for something defined as the buffer. we talked about fencing. I'd like to see a privacy fence there where light's not going to shine through, to be probably an 8' minimum. I'd like to see that run the whole length of my property. If they can do it further, they can do it further. I'd like mounding on my side. We talked about pine trees or some types of trees right in that area, whether it be 3' mounding with staggered pine trees with mulch or chips. As far as a fence, if we do have a fence, who would be responsible for the maintenance of the fence? I know I'd probably be responsible for the maintenance, of any landscaping that they did on my property. There's nothing in there that defines the buffer and when the buffer is going to take place. Those are my concerns. Chairman Pro-Tem Regan said if I understand, we haven't gotten to that stage yet. When we get to that stage, they'll be back here to present their plans for the development that will include the landscaping as well We'll have plenty of questions. Correct me if I'm wrong, if that's the right time to bring it here.