07/30/1954 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 A member of the audience who had aided in the circulation of the petition against the passage~of proposed Ordinance Nom x.69 stated that that petition ha.d not been presented to the whole Village of Mayfield, but had been circulated only in the northerly portion of the Village of Mayfield. He also stated that approximately 80° of the residents of the northerly portion of the Village of I~fayfield had signed the petition against the passage of proposed Ordinance Nom x.69. Pfister. .. It was moved by Mr. ~Vhiting_and seconded by Mr. Oatess, that the petition in favor of the reconsideration of proposed Ordinance No. x.69 be incorporated into the ~~inutes of the Special b7eeting of Council of July 30, 195., and that it be noted ,that the petition was circulated by ~essx~s Shortle, Wiela3~d and Dixon, among others, and had been presented to Council by Mr. Roll Call: ,Ayes - Messrs.Endress,Taylor,'~Vhiting,Beard ~ Oatess. - Nays - None. I~4otion Carried 1 Mr. Whiting stated that he opposed the passage of Ordinance No. t~b9 and that he was aware of no reason to change his opinion on the matter. He thought that the significent number of signatures on the petition a_rx favor of reconsideration of proposed Ordinance No. 4 69 merited consideration. Mr. Oatess questioned the advisability of another public .hearing on this matter. 11~tr. ,Whiting suggested, since new matters are to be oo nsidered, it seems that another public hearing must be held on the passage of proposed Ordinance Nom 169 . It4r. Walsh stated that SOPyT Center Road is a highway, and that in the future it will be commercialized to some extent, at least.. Therefore, a Redifer Bus Terminal would be the least objectionable commercial enterprise. Pvir. 'dValsh stated that future action should be taken by Council in arm event. Mr. Vdhiting stated that it seemed that the petition in favor of reconsideration of proposed Ordinance No. x.69 eras not fairly presented to those whose signatures had been procured. IJir. Taylor asked of the procedure v,r which must be followed by the Redifer Bus Company if Ordinance No. l~69 is passed. Mayor I~odgson stated that all the procedures applicable to the procurement of a special permit under the Zoning Ordinances of the Village of P~~ayfield must still be follotiYed. It was moved by Mr. Endress, seconded by Mr. Beard, that_the vote on proposed Ordinance No. t~69 be reconsidered. Roll Call: Ayes - P~Zessrs Endress, Taylor, Whiting, Beard & Oatess. Nays - None. P.4otion Carried 1 Mayor Hodgson stated that a public hearing will be held on the application for a special permit to operate any business on the property thus affected by proposed Ordinance No. l~69. 3.