03/21/1955 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

needed and the job would cost both 1Tayfield Village and Mayfield Heights $500.00 each. He suggested that, inasmuch as culverts under driveways would 'oe necessary, the property owners be asked to deposit with the clerk sufficient money for this pipe, and the village buy and install thera as the work progressed. Mr. Rogers brought up the subject of the county accepting this road, and the fact that the part of the road used at present was the T`iayfield Heights side of the road. Ou.r Engineer stated that this acceptance by the. county had always been held up because of the inability of Lyndhurst to obtain a right of way over a portion of the road, but that this had no`s been accomplished and 1`'Ta.yor Elbrecht was working on the prospect of County Acceptance. He suggested that our mayor get in touch z~rith Mr. Elbrecht for further information. - Oiir solicitor brought out that, inasmuch as the portion of the road now in use was in Mla.yfield Heights, the village could not legally spend money to put it in repair. -Mayor Endress then recommended that the committee report back to T'k.yfield Heights that our village was unable to participate in any project at this time. ~'Tr. Wieland was authorized to make the road passable over the Tlayfield Village side. Mr. Ovi.att, attorney at law representing Mr. and Mrs. Leonard I~1CGurer of 1090 Washington Blvd. in our village, read to Council a letter which he had written to the Mayor and Clerk. He brought out that the McGurers were unable to obtain a guaranteed title to their property, as, the Washington Boulevard Extension appeared to be a figment of some one's imagination . The thirty foot strip used a s ingress and egress to the property and supposedly called "The Washington Boulevard Extension" had been sold at auditor's sale and acquired by Mr. T~7iller separately from acreage to the ~lorth which he has been attempting to develop. Mr. Oviatt then asked Council to consider the plight of his client and the two other property owners on this proposed roadway in considering the platting of the Miller developrment.- Cur Engineer then brought out the Miller Plat and showed it to Council. Mr. ~riatt wanted Washington Boulevard accepted as a platted street at the same time as the Miller Plat., or an easement or- deed given to the village over this proposed street. It was moved, by T'~~°. Wh.iting, seconded by NTr. Strater, that action on the.T'liller plat be suspended until our Solicitor could be satisfied that the three property okmers on Washington Boulevard Extension are protected in the matter of access to Ridgebury Boulevard and the future interest of the v~.llage and development company are protected. Roll Call: Ayes - T'2essrs Swanson,strater,Whiting,Beard & Oatess. Nays -None. - Motion Carried The matter of a plat for I'Iaplegrove was brought up and our Engineer showed Council the vacating plat of this street. The Cler1L signed and sealed this plat and it tress given to our Engineer to be filed and recorded at the County Auditor's Cffice. The T'Tayor then read a Petition from residents of SOM Center Road petitioning Council for water from the Northerly line of Highland Road I~orth to Schulz's property, 88/ of the cost of this project to be assessed abutting property owners. At this point our Solicitor, Ivlr. Edelman, brought up the fact that there tress insufficient money in the water main trust fund to carry out this project, and some thought should be given to selling sufficient of our remaining ~1~0,000.00 bonds to 2.