Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Mr. Wedler, seconded by Mrso Brown, tha.t arclinance No. 549 <br />be approved -,and passed as read. <br />Ra,..1,. CaLl: Ayes - Messrs TnTed].er9Strater,Broti,rn,Falk and HopkinGo <br />' Nays- Nonee <br />" Nlotion carried <br />as°d3nance passed <br />Plans were then discussed for the improvement of the streets in the I^lar°ton <br />Park Area., but a.s no estiiraate of costs was available, ouz° Engineer adv3.sed _ <br />si;utrang the flood survey and these plans together, and suggested anot-Yer meeting <br />beiol^e furtner consideration of any plans. Mr. Deanore prornised'to have some <br />estimate of costs at this'time. <br />Nir0 Edel-nan repor'ued tnat he had a resolution from the I11u.minati.ng Company <br />approving specifications and plat, and ask3ng the C1erk to adverta.se for bids. <br />PZr. Edelman sa3.d he would check and see if'an adve2tisement was necessary. <br />14rs. Brown, seconded by Nlra Hopkins, then introduced Resolution No. 340 entitledm <br />"An Eimrgency Resolation. Approving .9pecifications and Plat for Furnish3,ng <br />E1.ectric. Street Light3ng Sex4vi.ce in the Vi1l.age and D3x°ec-ting the Clerk of the <br />ga.1.].age to Advex°tise for Bids ?or Furnishing Suclz Service°' Tfrhich resolution <br />was iead to Council. <br />It was moved by Mr. Hoplcz.ris., seconded by Nr. Stratera that the rules of l,aw <br />raquasii2g a reso].ut3.on to be reacl on three separate oceasions be suspended. <br />Roll Ca11: Ayes - Messrs Wedler9 Strater, Brown, Fa].k and HopkaiLS. <br />Nays - None. <br />Motion carried <br />Rules Suspended <br />It was moved by Mrs. Brown, seconded by Mr. Hopkins, that Resolution <br />No, 340 be approved and passed as read. <br />Royl Ca1].e Ayes - Messrs ?ATedler, Strater, Brown, Falk and Hopkins. <br />Nays - Noneo . . <br />1`jotion caz°x°3ed <br />Resolution passed <br />I1,13r. Edelman then read a letter from Mr, George Zorn of I°Ietro Park Drive., <br />asking that.Council take action to provent the oi,raer of Sublot Plo. 7 on Metro <br />Parl{ Drive from making any connection to thE water main on this street (._which <br />h?,d been privately finarzced) until the cost of construction against this lot <br />had been paid. As this was a private riatter, there was a great deal of <br />discussion in Council as to whether they should take any action. The (3mer of <br />Sub-Lot No. ? was present and signi.fied that he had no objection to such action, <br />provided th.e normal exemption for a corner 1ot was cons3dsred and a specified <br />amount was included in such proceedings. Mr. Hopla.ns' seconded by Mr. Strater, <br />then°introduced Resolution No. 341 entitled: !"A Resolution Prohibiting Making <br />of Cbnnecta.ons From the Easterly 100 Feet of Sublot No. 7 on._Proposed 14etro <br />Park-Drive, to the Water.Main Therein, W1thout Payment of a Portion of. the Cost <br />Ther6of"e which resalution was.read to'Council.._ <br />It tras moved by Nrs Hopkins, seconded by Mra Strater, tha.t the rules of <br />law 'requ.irinj a resolution to be read on three separate occasions be suspenc7edo <br />` Ro17. Callm Ayes - 111essrs Kedler, Strater, Brown, Falk and Hopkins. <br />r Nays - None, <br />_ Motion caxried <br />Ru1es suspended 5.