Laserfiche WebLink
N?r. Reed said that Rev. Simmons had sa:i.d that- he bougnt the property <br />and asked for proofo Rev. ?Sinmons said tia.t it would be producecl at the proper <br />tisnee , <br />Asked ii he was involved'in any litigation over money, Rev. Sirrunons <br />a-t first said "No", and 7ater said that he was involved in litiga.tion csver the <br />bequest in a tiTil1 to a member in his fami.ly, He said -that it was now in the <br />higher courts, and that he lost the case in the loUrer cour'(;e <br />Mayoi Endsess then, aslced if Council wished to do anything about the <br />recorimiendation of the Zoning and Planning Commissione <br />. Mxa Taylor, seconded by 1°1re Hopki.ns, then introduced Resolution No. <br />392 entitled, "A Resolution Granting aSpecial Permit to Rev. Cecil Simmons <br />to Use Certain Premises on S. 0. M. Center Road as a Church.° <br />As there.was no motion to suspend the rules, this resol.ution Taas placed <br />_ on it s first reacling. • <br />Mr. lober, a residenL of Seneca Road and one of the signers of a peti.- <br />, tion for cleaning up this area, again. -took assue with Council on the amount of time <br />, it would take to effect a change and asked u the BroVrn Fence and Wire Co. could <br />use a driveway onto Seneca Road.outside the area zoneciior business. 147ro lober <br />then brought up the fact that, although Mro Boraonaro had promised with the <br />o-thers to affect a change, he had ssnr!ediately c ome around and installed a culvert <br />pipe in the road so that Br(xq-n rence and Wir.e cou1d in lre Tober's. es-timation have <br />a driveway for business in a residential area, althoujh this company also had a <br />drive onto S. Oe NIe Center Road. <br />Nr. Strater agaan told Mr. Tober and others from Seneca. of tize plans of <br />tne Safety and service Committee and asked for time enough, to put them into action. <br />Qur Engineer then presented plans and specifications.for sideVralks on <br />S. 0, 14. Center Road from Trdilson Nills to Seneca, which brought up the rratter for <br />eliscussion. The C1.erk reported tha.t he had iovnd no easements, but, dize to the <br />considerable amount of legislation and the fact.tha.t bonds had been sold and <br />p'roperty assessed for the previous sideUralk, he was sure that somewhere in the <br />County off?ces, records would Ue found showing easements for this sidewallc. <br />Otzr Engineer was asked to check the County records back to 1921 for this purpase. <br />Mayor Endress then r.ead a letter from Nr. Ga1limore wi-th reference to <br />- storm sewers on Wils on Mills.. Xr,, DeI'Iore then explained thai; 9 a s the wideninrp of <br />Wilson Mills was a No. l priority, it Vras going through, and, left to their cr?rn <br />: devices and proYi.bited by latq frorn doin.g othertirise, the cotuzty would install cul- <br />ve°rri-;s just large enough t o take care of storm water on -the r oad propero "This" 9 <br />said Mr. DeNore, "would prohibit any future plans for s-torm sewer. s in this area <br />Urithout double expense" m Mr. DeMore said that •a • study of the need.,s of the three <br />v?',_llage s should b e undertaken and rra de available t o t he C olulty bef ore the y <br />staxted operations and ?he?r ?n tw.°n could construc? culverts sufficieryt for tne <br />fu-tu;re needs of the three villageso Thzs stmvey t,rould cost ?300.00. <br />.. I-t Uas tnen nioved by Nrs. Bravm-, seconded by itr. •laylor, tha.t our <br />Engineer malce this survey in our Villaoe £or a sum not to exceed 6100o00m <br />RoLL Call: Ayes - Messrsa TaYlor, Wedler, Stratgr9 BrotJn, Falk <br />and Hoplcins. <br />7.