My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/1957 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1957
>
12/16/1957 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:05:44 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 3:49:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
12/16/1957
Year
1957
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- It, was moved by NIr. Hopkiensy seconded ly Mr. Tay7.or, that OrC7.inance <br />No. 604 be approvecl and passed as reado . ° <br />Ron Ca1.la Ayes - Messrs Tay1.or,Wec11er9Strater.,Fa3.k and Hopkins, <br />Nays - Non&. <br />. Motion cary°s.ed <br />Ordinance Passed <br />Mr. Strat,er .theri reported that the Safety Committee had discussed the <br />pipes and ditches on Thornapple and recomanended to Crnxncil. that all ordinanees <br />pertaining to pipes arrd ditchas be enforced. °Mr. Hoplciais then read the bi1,1 <br />for $265.00 received for the apen3.ng of ditches on Thoz°nappleo Mr. Hopkins <br />then asked about Mr. Fisherts son and said that ha,s property did not figure <br />in tfiis bill.. Mr..Edelanan then read our Ordinance pertaining to this matter. Mr. <br />Fishei-,. who was present,.said that' he did not have a pipe under liis dri.veway <br />because th@re was no watex° the`re, but that he' did have a gipe tznd.et the drive*rray <br />hal..f-way between the road and hi.s house where the watei- ran under the di-iveo <br />Asked"if he had had a pipe under the driveway before it was macadainized, Mp• <br />Fisher said that he did9 but that it was taken out because it was unnecessary. <br />Our Eng3.neer veri.fied the fact that the land fell away on bath sides of Mr• <br />Fishert.s driveuray and that there was"a pipe under the drive near catch basins <br />which drained the side of the roadv ' <br />` . . <br />Mayor Endress then suggested that we pay the bi1l for operLi.ng the <br />ditches on Thornapple' but lio].d the bond money unti.l a pipe had been put uncler <br />the propert?f belonging to Mr. Fisheras son. <br />It was moved by Mrm .Hopld.ns9 seconded by Mr. Fa1.k'.that: the C].erlc be <br />authorized to pay the bill for ditching Thornapple and withho].d.. the differ- <br />ence tant,i.l the °matter of drainage under the dr3veway had been reso3.ved by a <br />meet,ing of the Commi.ttee, <br />" Ro3:L Cal].s A.yes - Messrs Taylor, Wecll.er' Stratera Falk and Hopkins. <br />Nays - Idone. , . <br />' Motion Carried <br />Mayor Endress then appointed Mr. Wed].ex° and Mr. Hopkins to inspect <br />this road with our Engineer. <br />There w?ds nothing to repox°t from the. Finance Cornm.ittee. <br />There was nothing to report fronl the Zoning arxi Planning. Corrmission. <br />Mayor Endress then asked Council if they had a copy of Mro Gallimorers <br />letter re].ative.to the Tiaiaerirag of Wilson NIi3.ls and asked olxr Engineer to - <br />talk on the subject. Njr, DeMore said that the 1ett,er was seli e::p7.anatory <br />and that he wou,d answer arW questians on the subject. He said that Mro <br />Ga1Li.more was going to investigate aLl connections and woiald arri.ve at some <br />sort of cost; that it was vexy practical and necessary that all connections <br />be put in9 because it would cost between six and seven hundred doLl.ars more <br />if it vrere done after the road was wi.dened. Mr. DeMore s:aid that the County <br />5.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.