|
It was moved by Mr. Shaw, seconded by Mr. Mason, that Ordinance No. 897
<br />be approved and passed as read. _
<br />Roll Call': Ayes - 14essrs Shaw,.-Bennett, Walker, Mason, Sloan.& Belzer.
<br />Nays - None.
<br />, . motion carried
<br />. Ordinance Passed
<br />Mr. Shaw, seconded by- Mr; -Mason, then intr:oduced Ordinance No, 89,8,..
<br />entitled; "An Ordinance Authorizing the Mayor and the Clerlc to rnter Into an.
<br />Agreement With the Village of Highland Heights For the Sharing of the Costs
<br />Incurred in the Adjustment and Relocation of Water biains and Sanitary Sewers
<br />Located in Lander Road" which ordinance was read to Council.
<br />. _ . , .. , . ,
<br />It was moved by Mr. Shaw, seconcied by Mr. Walker,_ that the rules, of . law
<br />requiring an Ordinance to be read on three separate occasions be suspended.
<br />Roll Ca11: Ayes - Messrs Shaw, Benn.ett, Taalker, Mason, Sloan ? Belzer.
<br />Nays - None..
<br />Mot,.ion carr.ied ,
<br />Rules Suspended
<br />It was,moved•by Mr. b4ason, seconded by Mr., Shaw,. Lhat.Ordinance No. .89,8
<br />be approved arid passed as read.., .
<br />Roll Call: Ayes - Plessrs Shaw, Bennett, Walker, Niason, Sloan & Belzer.
<br />Nays - None. . .
<br />, . , • , , motion carried
<br />, , . Rules Suspended
<br />It was moved by Mr..rlason, seconded by Mr..Shaw,:that Ordinance_No. 898
<br />be approved and passed as read.
<br />••Roll Call: Ayes - Messrs Shaw, Bennett, tJallcer, Mason, Sloan & I3elzer.
<br />Nays - None. . ,
<br />D4otion carried
<br />. Ordinattce Passed
<br />The Mayor then read a report f rom the Assessment Equalization Board statin.g
<br />that they had met on the objections of Mr. Scheer and Mrs. Gillis; that they f ound
<br />that the. assessments. conformed to i:he resolution and are in apportionment, therefor
<br />they f ound the asses.sments as reported to be proper; they upheld the assessments
<br />and overruled the objecY.ions. It was the opitzion of our_Engineer.that the, pave-
<br />ment in front of the homes that are objecting should be put in.. P1r.:Bennett said
<br />that it was a mistalce that we did not go all the way to [Jilson Niills Road. There
<br />was considerable discussion with Council and residents of this area. Mr. Shaca,
<br />seconded by Mr. Mason9 then introduced Resolution No. 646, entitled: "A Resol-
<br />' ution Approving the Report of the Assessment Equalization F3oard on Objections
<br />Concerning the Estimated Assessments for the Improvement of Worton Partc Drive,
<br />North Woodlane Drive, Norman Lane, South Woodlane Drive and Woodlane Drive, by
<br />Grading, Draining and Paving With Asphaltic Materials, Together With all
<br />Necessary Appurtenances" , which resolution was read to Council.
<br />&.
|