Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br />be giving up some of its authority and it was speculation that <br />the County would be doing the work. r3e said there is the possi- <br />bility the Village would have to pay the Engineer's fee and then <br />the County not follow through with the construction. . <br />b~ir. Barclay wondered why, since not all communities paid the <br />Engineer's fee, the Federal Government couldn't pay these fees. <br />i~ir. Bordonaro asked if the Engineer's fee is negotiable: <br />T~~ir. Hovancsek said he had a contract saying his fee would be a <br />percent of the construction cost. <br />Asir. Barclay as}ced if the Engineer's fee is calculated on cost <br />after the .z,dvertising Bid is accepted? He said the longer they <br />wait the higher the fee. <br />i~r. Barclay mentioned that an agreement had been signed for <br />the traffic signalization and as yet no light had been erected <br />and the prices are sky rocketing. <br />A4r. Bordoanro asked if a time limit could be inserted in the <br />agreement? <br />A'ir. Hovancsek said the County did not put in for the Federal <br />Funds until the plans are submitted. <br />Mr. Grogan asked what would happen if the Village passed their <br />Ordinance and Gates I~~2ills did not. <br />i~~ir. Hovancsek said Gates Mills were in the same position as the <br />Village. He said it would take approximately three rnonths.to <br />draw up the plans and estimated construction to begin in 1978. <br />T~Ir. Busa commented that it was tremendous improvement for the <br />actual Village funds spent, approximately $17,000.00 for a <br />$260,000.00 project. <br />I•Ir. Barclay asked why we couldn't draw up our own agreement: <br />Air. Busa said he felt they would be setting themselves up for <br />a rejection if the agreement were .changed. <br />Roll Call: AYES: Messrs., Bordonaro, Busa, Fly:Zn, Grogan and <br />Schulte <br />iJ?~YS : i~Ir . B arc 1 ay <br />i•Iotion Carried <br />Ordinance Passed <br />Ordinance 77-29, entitled; "A1N OI2DIII~NCE SI~~iENDING ORDINANCE NO. <br />77-22 PRESCRIBING SALARIES , I?3.TE5 OF COT~7PENS?~1.TION, VACTION <br />SCHEDULE r'~ND OTIiEP. BEINEFITS FOR Ei~iPLOYEES OF THE I•IUNICIPT-sLITY, <br />t~ND DECLARING AN: EMERGENCY" , was introduced by I-ir. Bennett. <br />I•Zr. Busa, seconded by I~Ir. Flynn, made a motion to suspend the <br />rules of law requiring an Ordinance to be read on three separate <br />occasions. <br />0 <br />i~ ~ <br />