Laserfiche WebLink
-2- . <br />? <br />Park people had between 60--80 bags of leaves. Mr. Prior injected ' <br />i that half of the neighbors in that area had invested $160 in a leaf i shreader bagger to reduce the volume. Also as noted in the "Voice . <br />of the Village", Mr. Shiffer was responsible for only 6--8 bags per <br />home and knows he's been subjected to more than that. Mr. P'rior <br />" mentioned he read the State may resc:tnd the open burning ].aw to allow . <br />residential people to burn on their own property. The Mayor replied <br />a letter had been sent to Columbus, and their response was stronger . <br />' than ever. Mr. Leech asked Mr. Shiffer for comparison figures over .• <br />• the past couple of years. Mr. 5chmidt stated, "if there is an increasq .. <br />you have the right to increase the cost even though it is in the con- <br />tract. You were asked to sign the new contract because time was runn- , <br />ing out and wasntt Council suppose to get.back at a later date with <br />some answer from a couple of ineetings ago when this matter was first <br />discussed?" Mr. Shiffer: Yes. Mr. Schmidt concluded by saying we have a record of what he made last year and this and doesn't see what ` <br />the problem is. Mr. Boger stated we're asking for a breakdown on the - w <br />` cost. Mr. Relic said after Finance has received the statements of <br />.. facts and figures, a recommendation would.be made to-Council. - ; Mr. Boger, seconded by Mr. Davis, motioned to have:the minutes of the <br />i 0ctober 18 meetin9 aPProved as written.• ??.... <br />. . . <br />Roll Callt AYES: Messrs,. Boger, Bordonaro, Braung DavisI,?`. <br />; , - Leech p & .; Schmidt , . -,. <br />i NAYS: None Motion Carried '_ . <br />; Minutes Approved <br />New Business: . . <br />- Harry Krause, employee of the Service Department, was sworn in by Mr. Edelman, a Notary Public, as a part time Fireman. CEI: The Mayor stated a couple meetings had transpired and referred .,"., <br />to bulletin board in Council chambers with photographs of area for <br />proposed lighting. CEI is suggesting 70--90' poles where it would be ., <br />necessary to trim trees from 51--451. The question is the real need •• <br />for above ground high voltage wires, if in 10 years wiring would be <br />?? . undergroundo CEI has similar cases in other communitiesa Mr. Edelman :. <br />suggested we await results from other areas. . <br />Street Liqhtinq: The Mayor stated subject had been discussed at sev- <br />-` eral Council meetings and mentioned 90% of survey conducted in "Voice <br />of the Village" revealed people were opposed, even to hazzardous <br />areas where Police have recommended street lights be installed. One <br />` -.exception was Aintree Park area where people have paid for underground wiring. The Mayor suggested Council review once more and make a decis- <br />ion at next Council meeting. Mr. Leech commented he thought final <br />action-had been approved by Council, therefore, should either proceed . ,.or withdraw as we had agreed to go along ma3n arteries. The Mayor <br />- replied people do not want lights even on intersections. Mr. Leech said perhaps we should go ahead at intersections where people do want <br />„the lights and also consider secommendations of the Police Department.; <br />- . ?. :. , _ ? . . . _.. ,