Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULRFt MEETSNG <br />Village of Mayfield <br />January 15, .1973 <br />The Council of the Village of Mayfield met in regular session at <br />Mayfield Village Hall on January 15 at.8:05 p.m. Mayor Beebe presided. <br />The Pledge ot Allegiance to the Flag was given.: ' <br />Roll Call: Present: Mayor Beebe, Messrs. Boger, Bordonaro, <br />Braun, Davis, & Schmidt <br />Absent: Mr. Leech <br />Also present were Messrs.• Relic, Byrnes, Hovancsek, D'Agostino,_ and <br />Chief Shortle. Chief Hejcl was called to answer a fire alarm. <br />The Mayor prefaced this open segment of the meeting by reminding the <br />audience that the open heaxing on Ordinance 72-2 had already been held. <br />A half-hour only will be allotted for this subject and any others. <br />Comments from the fl.oor: <br />Richard Kleinman, Attorney (1110 Euclid Avenue) represented Howard <br />Schul.z a1d Donray Products : Most of the property owners (230 acres ) are <br />here. Mr. Schulz has 40 acres and Donray Products has 8. The major <br />objection to rezoning this area from industrial to single fami:ly useage <br />is because they"can't get proper sewers in for 10 years. Rezoning would <br />be highly detrimental to the owners. The Council is demanding useage <br />which the people do not want. There is no reason why this came up to <br />begin with. <br />Robert Jaffe,- Attorney (2121 South Green) represented Mr. Weisburg <br />and Mr. Leon.ardi: Mr. Jaffe referred to a letter from Forest City. <br />Recommended notices be sent to at least two or three people in the. " <br />immediate area. Object to rezoning to single family making it a non- <br />conforming use. Suggest something more than a routirie passage of this <br />Ordi.nance. A master plan was designed by Regional Planning in 1962 at <br />which time SOM Center Road was already the heaviest travelled in the <br />Village. Rather than act quickly, send this back to Regional Planning <br />or some party of planning experts to make suggestions and give property <br />owners an opportunity to make a decision. Doesn't it make sense to <br />treat this thing fairly? Let's study it and get.expert advice. <br />Ruth Gilles, 6180 Wilson Mills Road: I have to be much more objective. <br />I don't own property there. We have a].ready deprived these people <br />due process of law. Are we trying to advertise for.I-290 to come <br />through., Mr. Beebe, are you going to the meeting this Friday? The <br />Mayor repliecl he knew nothing about it. Unti1 we have a feasible plan <br />we should keep this as a safeguard. Leave this zoning as-is this time <br />around. <br />Pat LaConte, Parkview Golf Course: Without receiving any notice and <br />? having lived in your Vill.age a number of years, I am opposed to your <br />rules of law._ In acquiring additional property our intentions were to <br />realize its best use for the time being and for the future. Have macie