01/15/1973 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- 2- more acquisiti.ons of land based on the premise it would be used for recreation. Suddenly .there is a request for change and can't realize the reason for it. Some measure should be taken so the owners of this property be contacted.. The Mayor reminded the audience this Ordinance has been fully exposed at Council, Planning & Zoning (minutes posted at some five places i.n the Village) and published in the newspapers. =ndividual written notices are not required by law if more than 10 property owners are involved. Charles Studen, owner of Donray Products: We do not question the legal- ity.but the moral issue involved. 2 have one million dollars invested and feel 2 should have been notified. In 1967 I purchased the property and did change the plans calling for anticipated development of the property. Had a contract that no purchase would be made without the bl.essing of the Village. My entire property does become jeopardized and I become a non-conforming useage and we cannot live or tolerate this type of situation and did make investments on the fai.th and trust of this Council. It is not fair. We did confoxm with alI sewer require- ments for no other use than for that for which it was given and have it remai.n, commercial/industriale SOM is an industrial highway. 2• don't know of anybody who's going to put up a 50 or 60 thousanci dollar home. . Frank Rivers, 400 SOM Center Road: In favor of,retaining present zoning. Bob Grogan, 480 Oakton Circle: Residents of Kenwood don't want any more industrial expansion on SOM. We have enough industry in this town. Orest Stecker, 6759 Glenview: These people who have all this valuable land I really cry for. I have % acre investment and am satisfied with it. If you invested unwisely in too much property my heart bleeds for you. Martin Comella, 673 Robley Lane: This property was rezoned over 10 years ago and has been stated by a couple of people they were not consulted. You are in.a small minority who have this land. I thi.nk it,is enti.rely in order to have this land rezoned back to residential because i.t was. Howard Schulz, 840 SOM Center Road: There were open hearings, detailed effort made by Regional Planning, thousands of do].lars and many hours of hard work. It was recommended that the proposal be accepted. I am certainly at a loss why we were not permitted to discuss the zoning on the Citizens Master Plan. I requested it and was refused. Ken- wood area, you are nothing but north-end hicks. Mr. Dattilo, 6706 Sandalwood: Asked Council how many pieces of prop- erty owners are involved in this situation and how many were originally ? owners at the time rezoning was asked. No one had the answer. ? Howard Steiil, Attorney (1100 Citizens Building) represented the La Contes: Had no notices. We would request that the hearing be reopened