Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />3/18/91 <br />Page Two <br />Mayor Carmen said he does not think there is anyone on Council who would not like to protect the <br />golf course. The concern is the cost and the overall impact on our budget. He said there was a <br />comment that if we took it by eminent domain that it would genera.te enough revenue to pay for <br />itself. If that were the case, Mayor Carmen said he thinks they would do it. One problem is the <br />numbers the Finance Director ran did not support that theory; it was quite the contrary. Mayor <br />Carmen explained that it would seriously impact our capital budget and expressed a concern <br />regarding what would happen if they guessed wrong as to the fair market value of the golf course <br />which would put them in trouble from a financial standpoint. He thinks everyone agrees that it <br />would be the ultimate thing to do; however the concern is the monetary impact it would have on us <br />if it would not bear out to be a profitable venture. Mayor Carmen said he knew there was an <br />"intent" ordinance to pursue and invesrigate the project but there is no outstanding ordinance to <br />acquire the golf course at this point. He said he realizes that people are asking what will be done <br />with this issue; they are very anxious. <br />Mr. Bill Cronemever. 6847 Creekwood, said the scenario he questions pertains to the lawsuit <br />under which the matter would be settled without public referendum by vote of Council which <br />would permit apartment buildings to be on the property. <br /> <br />Mayor Cazmen said technically no, but as a pracrical matter yes. He explained that a referendum is <br />required for any area to be rezoned. He said, however, if a developer sued a judgement could be <br />pnt on by a Court. He said if the zoning will change that it will only change by a vote of the people <br />or by a Court ruling. <br />Mark Fixler, 6758 Bramblewood, asked if given the choice between office campus and semi high <br />rise apaztments what they would choose. <br />Mayor Cannen said that they do not plan to change the current 35' height restriction. <br />Tom Welo. 6467 Chase Drive, said he would like to find something out from an article he read in <br />the Plain Dealer yesterda.y. He said it was about people who ran for office and lost; he said he <br />does not lrnow the details--that is why he is here. He said the article implied that a letter was sent <br />from Council endorsing a couple of candidates against two who ran. He does not know if the <br />taxpayers paid for that letter; then he finds the Village is being sued because of the words that were <br />taken in the letter and the taxpayers are being asked to fend against two malcontents. <br />Mayor Carmen said he cannot get into it too much because it is currently a litigarion matter. He <br />said that the first question was whether the taxpayers paid for the letter that was sent out.lVlayor <br />Carmen said it was paid for by himself and the people on Council at that rime. He said the suit is <br />about a letter that was sent in response to a letter sent by the "Coalirion for Better Government" <br />group which they felt this rime they had to respond to. He said the lawsuit was filed against <br />himself in his capacity as Mayor and against the members of Council in their capacity as Council <br />rnembers and against Donna Heath as Clerk of Council. He said that he was also named personally <br />in the suit and that he is represenring himself in that capacity. The Village Law Director is <br />representing everyone who was sued in their capacity as Village officials and approximately $900 <br />has been spent to date. Mayor Carmen said their goal is to have the lawsuit go away and in <br />addirion to that they will attempt to recover any legal fees incurred by the Village as a result of the <br />lawsuit.