My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/20/1994 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1994
>
06/20/1994 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:12:11 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 8:52:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/20/1994
Year
1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
172 <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />6/20/94 <br />Page Twelve <br />Progressive Variance Request - Color of Sign Letters and Illumination <br />Mr. Diemert read the motion: A motion to grant a variance to Progressive Insurance <br />Company from the requirement as to the color of the sign letters from white to a backlit <br />illuminated blue. <br />Mr. Fixler, seconded by 1VIr. Ferrante, made a motion to grant a variance to Progressive <br />Insurance Company from the requirement as to the color of the sign letters from white <br />to a backlit illuminated blue. <br />Mr. Fixler said at the last Caucus meeting, they held a discussion with Progressive. He <br />remembers discussion regarding what would be an acceptable reason for rejection. He <br />recalls some of the reasons were: it would set a precedence for other buildings or other <br />businesses in Mayfield Village, or, if the residents would be totally opposed to this. <br />That is when the idea of the model came out. It is quite clear that these residents came <br />forward and that probably would be the most acceptable reason of why not to grant it. <br />Mr. Fixler feels it is important to have in the record that Council looked at the model, <br />the resiclents had an opportunity to look at the model. If anyone said anyone is trying <br />to cause ill feelings or ill will toward Progressive, that would not be accurate. <br />Mayor Rinker said they are dealing with aesthetics. The Village has a height ordinance <br />and, historically, this community has been very much opposed to going above that. <br />Progressive is looking at two very sensitive issues by placing the sign in the fashion that <br />they want to do it. Those are fundamental points that he does not think they can get <br />around. <br />ROLL CALL: AYES: None <br />NAYS: All Motion Not Carried <br />Variance Request Rejected <br />Mr. Diemert said the extension of the lighting period beyond 7 p.m. to midnight is <br />therefore moot, so we will move onto the third one which will be the letter height <br />variance from 24" to 41". <br />Progressive Variance Request - Letter Height <br />Mr. Fixler, seconded by Mr. Basile, made a, motion to grant a letter height variance from <br />24" to 41" to Progressive Insurance Company. <br />Mr. Diemert said Planning and Zoning recommended this 5 to one.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.