Laserfiche WebLink
Special Council Meeting <br />6/29/95 <br />Page 4 <br />Mayor Rinker said we approved this drawing. If we are going to go back and <br />redesign the structure--unless there is some compelling reason to do so--he does not <br />want to. He disagrees with Mr. Fixler and believes the structure would look worse if <br />changed as Mr. Fixler suggested. <br />Mr. Busa said we hired a manager--we approved the drawing. Why change <br />anything now unless it is mandated or recommended by our manager? <br />After a lengthy discussion, Mr. Ferrante said all Council members present and <br />Mayor Rinker disagree with Mr. Fixler's suggestion, so why are we continuing <br />discussion? <br />Mr. Buckholtz asked about the fence. <br />Chief 1Vlohr said it is intended to be a security area and explained how the present <br />fence will be destroyed during construction. He said that at some time down the <br />road if Council so chooses--a fence would be installed. <br />Mr. Buckholtz wondered if thought would be given about having a gate that could <br />open (both ways--to and from the school property.) <br />First Reading of Ordinance No. 95-37 entitled; "An emergency ordinance <br />authorizing a contract for certain work on Phase II of the Fire Station construction <br />project." Introduced by Mayor Rinker and Council as a Whole. <br />NYr. Panzica explained this is for the masonry work--bid package 4--Northern Valley <br />Contractors in the amount of $378,445.00. <br />Mr. Ferrante, seconded by Mr. Buckholtz, made a motion to suspend the rules <br />requiring an ordinance to be read on three separate occasions. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Rules Suspended <br /> <br />11 <br />Mr. Busa, seconded by Mrs. Cinco, made a motion to enact Ordinance No. 95-37. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Ordinance Enacted <br />